Living with a chronic disease: insights from patients with a low socioeconomic status

Abstract

Background Little is known about how patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) experience their chronic disease, and how it impacts health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Compared to their more affluent counterparts, worse outcomes have been reported. A better understanding of the domains of HRQoL that are relevant to these specific populations is therefore needed. We explored the experiences of living with a chronic disease in low SES persons. Methods A qualitative interview study was performed in Flanders, Belgium. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in chronically ill patients, selected through purposive sampling. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis followed an inductive and iterative approach. Results Fifteen patients were interviewed. Six major themes were identified: a heavy bag to carry, loss of autonomous life, inner and outer loneliness, emotional imbalance, unmet need for support, and coping strategies. Patients experienced their illness as an additional problem on top of all other problems (i.e. financial/social problems, traumatic life events). In general, the disease burden and non-disease burden were mutually reinforcing, resulting in greater dependency, greater risk of social isolation, greater psychological distress, and greater risk of impaired HRQoL. Conclusions This study is the first to provide detailed insight into the experiences of living with a chronic disease in low SES persons. A conceptual model is proposed that can be used in daily clinical practice to raise awareness among clinicians and health care providers that the patient’s needs go beyond the disease itself. Future research is needed to validate and test the model.

“Losing Faith in My Body”: Body Image in Individuals Diagnosed with End-Stage Renal Disease as Reflected in Drawings and Narratives

“…The high levels of depression and low quality of life found in the current study are consistent with studies focusing on other chronic diseases indicating that the way patients with chronic diseases experience their bodies alters [ 51 ]. Chronic disease patients may struggle with identity, self-esteem, a shrinking lifeworld, and a challenging, complicated reality [ 52 ]. The disease becomes the most influential part of the patients’ lives, affecting their physical health and functions, autonomy, freedom, and identity, or even has a potentially life-threatening component that threatens their life [ 53 ].…”

A Middle-Range Theory of Social Isolation in Chronic Illness

“…Chronic illnesses hinder human beings from engaging in social interactions. A vast body of research describes chronic illnesses as disrupting social events [ 6 , 66 ].…”

“…Specifically, the onset of social isolation in people with a chronic illness is complex; health problems can alter one’s social network; for example, these individuals may view themselves as different from healthy persons due to disabling symptoms and related discomfort, or struggle to engage in social activities due to a lack of energy. As a result, the ill person may lack emotional support and experience loneliness [ 6 ].…”

Social and Regional Factors Predict the Likelihood of Admission to a Nursing Home After Acute Hospital Stay in Older People With Chronic Health Conditions: A Multilevel Analysis Using Routinely Collected Hospital and Census Data in Switzerland

“…The lower the socioeconomic status (SES) of an individual, the higher the risk of chronic diseases and multimorbidity such as mental health disorders, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases or cardiovascular diseases ( 15 , 16 ). Several studies have found that the social context of a person's life determines not only the risk of exposure and the degree of susceptibility but also the course and outcome of a disease depending on the capability to cope with the disease ( 8 , 17 , 18 ). However self-management of CHC is too often discussed from a purely individualistic perspective, ignoring the social and cultural context in which this process happens ( 19 , 20 ).…”