2015
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmv026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Living with joint hypermobility syndrome: patient experiences of diagnosis, referral and self-care

Abstract: Background.Musculoskeletal problems are common reasons for seeking primary health care. It has been suggested that many people with ‘everyday’ non-inflammatory musculoskeletal problems may have undiagnosed joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS), a complex multi-systemic condition. JHS is characterized by joint laxity, pain, fatigue and a wide range of other symptoms. Physiotherapy is usually the preferred treatment option for JHS, although diagnosis can be difficult. The lived experience of those with JHS requires… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
46
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients reported difficulties in being diagnosed and how they had encountered health professionals who they felt did not believe or understand their descriptions or their experiences of JHS. 49 The data indicate the importance of a timely diagnosis of JHS and referral for specialist care in order to facilitate effective treatment of JHS. Physiotherapy was viewed as beneficial if used to manage JHS holistically rather than to treat acute injuries in isolation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients reported difficulties in being diagnosed and how they had encountered health professionals who they felt did not believe or understand their descriptions or their experiences of JHS. 49 The data indicate the importance of a timely diagnosis of JHS and referral for specialist care in order to facilitate effective treatment of JHS. Physiotherapy was viewed as beneficial if used to manage JHS holistically rather than to treat acute injuries in isolation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings from this component have previously been published as peer-reviewed journal articles. 49,50 Objectives The specific objectives were as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Objectification relates to a person being described or categorsied in an objective way with a label or stamp. Those with JHS/EDS-HT report being labelled as “psychosomatic” or told the symptoms they are reporting are “all in the mind” (Terry et al, 2015). This may occur when a patient presents with an acute set of symptoms that are difficult to clinically reason.…”
Section: Insiderness/objectificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of choice may impact on a person’s sense of control, which contributes to feelings of anxiety. Those with JHS/EDS-HT have reported being prescribed treatments that provide little benefit and reduce their control of the situation (Terry et al, 2015), forcing them into being passive recipients of an intervention they do not understand. As HPs juggle the many competing elements of their roles there are benefits in encouraging those with JHS/EDS-HT to become active participants in the management of their condition (Alder, 2002; Charon, 2001; Peterkin, 2012).…”
Section: Agency/passivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…É ocasionada pela frouxidão ou comprimento excessivo do tecido, que leva ao aumento da amplitude de movimento além do normal, e pode estar acompanhada de queixas dolorosas (1) . Descrita pela primeira vez em 1967, a Síndrome de Hipermobilidade Articular (SHA) identifica-se pela associação da Hipermobilidade Articular (HA) com doenças musculoesqueléticas (2) e é caracterizada como uma desordem hereditária do tecido conectivo que pode desencadear luxação, subluxação, artralgia, artrite, tendinite, tenossinovite, ligamentos danificados e fraturas, existindo associação com dor nas articulações e instabilidade (5) e, geralmente, é avaliada utilizando-se os critérios de Brighton, que inclui a pontuação de Beighton (6) . Os critérios de Brighton são divididos em critérios maiores e critérios menores.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified