Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.99CH36304)
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.1999.830166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LMI-based control of linear systems with actuator amplitude and rate nonlinearities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result will follow the ideas discussed in Section III. Since the equivalent representation of the closed-loop system (14) presents two deadzone nonlinearities, two generalized sector conditions (12) and respective set inclusion conditions are considered in order to take into account the nonlinear behavior of the system. In order to compute the matrices of the dynamic compensator, the ideas proposed in [22], where appropriated change of variables allows the formulation of synthesis conditions in LMI form, are here adapted to also include the anti-windup gains (E c and F c ) and the variables associated to the sector conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This result will follow the ideas discussed in Section III. Since the equivalent representation of the closed-loop system (14) presents two deadzone nonlinearities, two generalized sector conditions (12) and respective set inclusion conditions are considered in order to take into account the nonlinear behavior of the system. In order to compute the matrices of the dynamic compensator, the ideas proposed in [22], where appropriated change of variables allows the formulation of synthesis conditions in LMI form, are here adapted to also include the anti-windup gains (E c and F c ) and the variables associated to the sector conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, when the time constant of the actuator dynamics tends to zero, the behavior of the position-feedback-type model tends to the "ideal" rate limiter, or, equivalently to the notion of a rate saturation operator as introduced in [5]. However, as pointed out in [12] and [13], if, in fact, the actuator dynamics is not represented by a first order model, the closed-loop stability cannot be ensured by the proposed methods. Furthermore, the position-feedback-type model seems to be unsuitable or imprecise for dealing with the rate saturation phenomenon in a discrete-time framework, representing a digital control system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations