2017
DOI: 10.1017/cem.2017.79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LO17: A comparative evaluation of ED crowding metrics and associations with patient mortality

Abstract: which 3440 were transferred to the EP (67.4%), 2958 of EP assessed callers (86.0%) had a family doctor, but only one-quarter of such patients could contact their family doctor. Overall, 2301/3440 "red" callers did not attend an ED (67.0%) compared to 2508/4770 in the control period (52.6%), for an absolute reduction of 14.4% (95% CI 12.2 to 16.4%, p < 0.0001). In callers for those <17 years old there was a 20.3% (95% CI 16.5 to 24.1%) reduction in ED visits compared to the control group: 771/1520 (50.7%) vs 36… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 While shorter LOSs can indicate poor quality of care if hospitals respond to financial pressures by reducing service durations and discharge patients earlier than appropriate, longer LOSs can indicate poor quality of care or of ED crowding that can result in complications that lead to longer LOSs. Despite the recent trend of shortening LOSs, recent body of evidence favors the link between increased LOS and poor quality/mortality (Tran et al, 2018;McRae et al, 2017;Chaou et al, 2016;Pines et al, 2010;Thomas et al, 1997). Reported numerical results are all statistically significant at the 5% level except for stroke only and AMI only subgroups, which are statistically significant at the 10% level.…”
Section: Subgroup Analyses and Robustness Checksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 While shorter LOSs can indicate poor quality of care if hospitals respond to financial pressures by reducing service durations and discharge patients earlier than appropriate, longer LOSs can indicate poor quality of care or of ED crowding that can result in complications that lead to longer LOSs. Despite the recent trend of shortening LOSs, recent body of evidence favors the link between increased LOS and poor quality/mortality (Tran et al, 2018;McRae et al, 2017;Chaou et al, 2016;Pines et al, 2010;Thomas et al, 1997). Reported numerical results are all statistically significant at the 5% level except for stroke only and AMI only subgroups, which are statistically significant at the 10% level.…”
Section: Subgroup Analyses and Robustness Checksmentioning
confidence: 99%