2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Load-Adapted Design of Generative Manufactured Lattice Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the results and demonstrate the capabilities of these lattice structures, the assessed value of stiffness-to-mass ratio RV is applied from [7]. In this paper, it is used to investigate the differences among these three unit cells filled structures by involving the critical results, the dependent relation between the force, the displacement and the responding weight.…”
Section: Comparison With the Same Rdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To evaluate the results and demonstrate the capabilities of these lattice structures, the assessed value of stiffness-to-mass ratio RV is applied from [7]. In this paper, it is used to investigate the differences among these three unit cells filled structures by involving the critical results, the dependent relation between the force, the displacement and the responding weight.…”
Section: Comparison With the Same Rdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lightweight design is one area that AM achieves well where it is impractical for other conventional fabrication technologies [1][2][3]. Currently there are two main methods of lightweight design, including cellular structure with unit cell [4][5][6] and topology optimization with advanced algorithm [2,3,7]. Topology optimization has only been used for maximum stiffness design to date but lacks sufficient capabilities for hierarchical design integrations at multiple scales [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To refine this classification, we conducted a study on 27 peerreviewed publications related to DFAM for decision making [8,9,13,[25][26][27][28][29][30][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56]. Three different ways to assist designers were identified.…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Dfammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their goal is to propose new shapes or new concepts with a creative approach based on the following premise [8,40]: in AM, there is no limit on feasible shapes and on materials distribution. We classify in this category methods based on optimization techniques (parametric and topological) [25,26], those using elementary shapes like lattices structures [41], cellular structures [39], or bionic structures [28] and those defining design features produced by specific AM technologies [30].…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Dfammentioning
confidence: 99%