2018
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2017.2681158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Load-Aware Performance Analysis of Cell Center/Edge Users in Random HetNets

Abstract: For real-time traffic, the link quality and call blocking probability (both derived from coverage probability) are realized to be poor for cell edge users (CEUs) compared to cell center users (CCUs) as the signal reception in the cell center region is better compared to the cell edge region. In heterogeneous networks (HetNets), the uncoordinated channel access by different types of base stations determine the interference statistics that further arbitrates the coverage probability. Thus, the spectrum allocatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification of the users into two categories, namely the CCUs and CEUs, is studied in [22] for a grid-based modeled cellular network. In the context of stochastic-based modeled cellular networks, recent studies deal with the classification of the users, which is either based on an signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio threshold [23] or the distance from the serving base station (BS) [24]. Even though the technologies of FD radio, mmWave communications and heterogeneous networks have been investigated in several works, their codesign, as well as the performance evaluation for different location-based user classifications in a heterogeneous cellular network has been disregarded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification of the users into two categories, namely the CCUs and CEUs, is studied in [22] for a grid-based modeled cellular network. In the context of stochastic-based modeled cellular networks, recent studies deal with the classification of the users, which is either based on an signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio threshold [23] or the distance from the serving base station (BS) [24]. Even though the technologies of FD radio, mmWave communications and heterogeneous networks have been investigated in several works, their codesign, as well as the performance evaluation for different location-based user classifications in a heterogeneous cellular network has been disregarded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…User classification approaches mainly focus on two aspects: the location-based [1], [3]- [6], and SINR based classification [2], [7]. The location-based classification relies on the geometric properties of the PPP in order to classify a user as CCU or CEU.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The location-based classification relies on the geometric properties of the PPP in order to classify a user as CCU or CEU. For instance, in [3], [4], authors computed the ratio of the distance between the typical user and the serving BS to the distance between the typical user to the nearest interfering BS. If the ratio is larger than a threshold, then the user is a CEU; otherwise, it is a CCU.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the scarcity of radio resource and the ease of deployment, co‐channel sharing would be more efficient and preferable for operators due to increased spectral efficiency through spectral frequency reuse. With this co‐channel sharing, the spectrum efficiency and network capacity can be enhanced 19‐24 . Therefore, this work considers the modified SSA and co‐channel spectrum sharing scheme for 5G/B5G HetNets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A strong motivation for viewing the BSs' arrangement as a point process can be drawn from the study of Lee et al 29‐31 By using Monte Carlo simulations, the downlink (DL) signal‐interference ratio distribution of an ideal hexagonal cellular system approaches that of a cellular system with BSs deployed according to a homogeneous Poisson point process (PPP) was shown in the work of Brown et al 32 Therefore, inspired by the above considerations, some works have evaluated the performance by using stochastic geometry based model, 10,15‐17,33‐36 even most of the existing works modeling cellular network as the traditional ideal hexagonal grid 8,14,37,38 . At the same time, by using stochastic geometry model, Mankar et al have also investigated the coverage performance of SSA‐based HetNets 19 . However, these works only modeled the locations of BSs and UEs in each tier as independent PPPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%