2020
DOI: 10.1680/jgele.19.00030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Load-controlled cyclic T-bar tests: a new method to assess effects of cyclic loading and consolidation

Abstract: Full-flow T-bar and ball penetrometer tests are often used to measure intact and remoulded soil 46 strengths, with the latter determined after several large amplitude displacement cycles. In 47 offshore design the remoulded soil strength is often the governing design parameter during 48 installation of subsea infrastructure, whilst a 'cyclic strength' applies for the less severe 49 operational cyclic loading. This paper utilises T-bar penetrometer tests to measure both 50 remoulded and cyclic strengths, where … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The steady seepage increases the profile of vertical effective stress with depth. Other studies using the same soil, reconstituted in the same way but without the seepage problem, show a strength of gradient of 2 kPa/m (Chow et al 2019;Zhou et al 2019b;O'Loughlin et al 2019), which is half of the gradient recorded in this study. Therefore, all the present results have been interpreted considering a doubling of the geostatic effective stress profile.…”
Section: Undrained Shear Strengthsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The steady seepage increases the profile of vertical effective stress with depth. Other studies using the same soil, reconstituted in the same way but without the seepage problem, show a strength of gradient of 2 kPa/m (Chow et al 2019;Zhou et al 2019b;O'Loughlin et al 2019), which is half of the gradient recorded in this study. Therefore, all the present results have been interpreted considering a doubling of the geostatic effective stress profile.…”
Section: Undrained Shear Strengthsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Figure 3a plots the undrained shear strength with normalised depth, z/DTbar, where su = qT-bar/NT-bar was interpreted assuming a constant T-bar capacity factor of NT-bar = 10.5. This value was selected based on theoretical solutions (Einav and Randolph 2005;Martin and Randolph 2006), and it has been adopted for other studies using the same soil (Chow et al 2019;Chang et al 2019;Zhou et al 2019b;O'Loughlin et al 2019). Negative values of undrained shear strength correspond to a downwards soil resistance on the T-bar penetrometer, which is created when the penetrometer moves upwards.…”
Section: Undrained Shear Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…d T −bar /D of 2.5) plotted against the penetration cycle number (N ), following the convention suggested by Randolph et al [17] and Zhou and Randolph [14] that the first pass is referred to as cycle number N = 0.25. The results extracted from five cyclic undrained T-bar penetration tests in UWA kaolin clay by Ragni et al [35] and O'Loughlin et al [55] are also presented in the figure with error bars representing the range and the symbols representing the mean value for the five tests. The contour plots of the local incremental equivalent plastic strain variable, εs , are presented in Figure 15 for the points A-H marked in Figure 14.…”
Section: Ldfe Modelling Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(c) UWA [54,55], the subsequent cycle generates a practically constant resistance with no reduction in resistance during the subsequent cycle. This is because the sensitivity state variable has already reached a minimum and re-consolidation did nothing to change that.…”
Section: Ldfe Modelling Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation