Proceedings 2003 VLDB Conference 2003
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012722442-8/50035-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Load Shedding in a Data Stream Manager

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
334
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 407 publications
(334 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
334
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stream systems such as Aurora [13] use semantic shedding [38] as one of the techniques to decide which tuples to drop when resources run low-that is, the less useful the data is for the recipient, the earlier it gets dropped. Here we take this concept further by deciding to drop (or generalize) tuples when a user's privacy would be violated.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stream systems such as Aurora [13] use semantic shedding [38] as one of the techniques to decide which tuples to drop when resources run low-that is, the less useful the data is for the recipient, the earlier it gets dropped. Here we take this concept further by deciding to drop (or generalize) tuples when a user's privacy would be violated.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also referred to as load shedding. Most current approaches are based on random load shedding [6,33,42] (Tatbul et al [42] also consider simple heuristics for semantic load shedding, where certain events have higher value to the query than others). Random load shedding works well for queries that compute aggregates, but as we show [17], random load shedding is inferior if we are concerned with the approximation quality of set-valued query results.…”
Section: Techniques For the Load Smoothing Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus it routes data through operators adaptively, based on arrival characteristics. Aurora [33,34] focuses on QoS-and memory-aware operator scheduling and load shedding for coping with transient spikes in data.…”
Section: Adaptive Query Processing With Relational Datamentioning
confidence: 99%