1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf00378222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Load size and energy delivery in birds feeding nestlings: Constraints on and alternative strategies to energy-maximization

Abstract: The Orians-Pearson model of central place foraging for multiple-prey loaders assumes, as does most of current foraging theory, (i) that the quantity to be maximized is rate of energy delivery, and (ii) that the capacity of the foraging animal is the only relevant constraint on this rate. When applied to the case of birds feeding nestlings the model predicts, therefore, that the parents should select whichever load size maximizes the rate of energy delivery to the young.We assume here (i) that the parents could… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fagerstr6m et al (1983) showed in a theoretical model that the receptive and digestive capacity of the nestlings during early phases of development would impose a constraint on the foraging capacity of the parents by forcing them to collect and deliver loads of smaller size than would be energetically optimal. Fagerstr6m et al (1983) showed in a theoretical model that the receptive and digestive capacity of the nestlings during early phases of development would impose a constraint on the foraging capacity of the parents by forcing them to collect and deliver loads of smaller size than would be energetically optimal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fagerstr6m et al (1983) showed in a theoretical model that the receptive and digestive capacity of the nestlings during early phases of development would impose a constraint on the foraging capacity of the parents by forcing them to collect and deliver loads of smaller size than would be energetically optimal. Fagerstr6m et al (1983) showed in a theoretical model that the receptive and digestive capacity of the nestlings during early phases of development would impose a constraint on the foraging capacity of the parents by forcing them to collect and deliver loads of smaller size than would be energetically optimal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider 3 currencies (reviewed by Houston 1987), although others (e.g., Fagerstrom et al 1983) may also be appropriate. The life span of honey bees (Apis meIlifera), at least, appears to be limited by energetic expenditure (Wolf and Schmid-Hempel 1989), leading to the prediction that bees should be sensitive to the diminution in their life span caused by energetic expenditures while foraging.…”
Section: The Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The foraging behavior of adult birds is commonly influenced by the development of their nestlings (Fagerström et al 1983). Furthermore, by influencing adult foraging patterns, nutritional requirements of nestlings may influence colony site selection .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%