This study examines whether the foraging behavior of worker bumble bees (Bombus: Apidae) collecting nectar on inflorescences of seablush (Plectritis congesta: Valerianaceae) is affected by colony energetic requirements, which were experimentally manipulated either by adding sucrose solution to honey pots or by removing virtually all available nectar from the pots. The competing hypotheses tested were: (1) no change; energetic requirements do not affect behavior, since there is a single best way to collect food in a given environment; (2) energetic currency; the energetic currency maximized by foragers changes according to colony energetic condition, with nectar-depletion causing a shift from maximizing long-term productivity to maximizing immediate energetic gain, thereby de-emphasizing energetic costs; and (3) predation; foragers devalue risk of predation as risk of starvation increaes, with colony nectar-depletion causing foragers to be less predation riskaverse in order to increase immediate energetic gain. Relative to when their colony energy reserves were enhanced, foragers from nectar-depleted colonies selected smaller inflorescences, visited fewer flowers per inflorescence, probed flowers at a higher rate while on each inflorescence, and walked between inflorescences less often, thereby spending a greater proportion of their foraging trip in flight. These behaviors increased a bee's energetic costs while foraging, and should also have increased its immediate energetic gains, allowing rejection of the no change hypothesis. Predictions of the predation hypothesis were generally not supported, and our results best support the energetic currency hypothesis. Foraging currency of bumble bees therefore appears to be a function of colony energetic state.Many of the early successful tests of foraging theory used nectar-collecting bumble bees (Pyke 1979(Pyke , 1980Hodges 1981;Best and Bierzychudek 1982). These tests Offprint requests to: R.V. Cartar addressed the problem of when a bee should move from one inflorescence to the next, given that the nectar rewards on inflorescences decrease in a predictable manner. Inflorescence-departure decisions were found to be predicted by the marginal value theorem (Charnov 1976), and the currency maximized by these bees appeared to be the rate of net energy intake.While the goal of net rate maximization is probably accurate in a general sense (i.e., over the long term), recent work suggests that it is not necessarily adequate as a short term currency for foragers (Stephens in press). The findings of risk-sensitivity (e.g. Caraco et al. 1980) and time discounting (Kagel et al. 1986) cannot be explained in terms of net rate maximizing. More recent approaches to foraging theory explicitly recognize tradeoffs between foraging and other activities, and the effects of time horizons and the forager's state on foraging behavior (e.g., McNamara and Houston 1986). Net rate maximizing, then, can be viewed as simply a special case subsumed within a general theoretical framework relating for...