2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2588-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loading deproteinized bovine bone with strontium enhances bone regeneration in rat calvarial critical size defects

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of grafting with strontium (Sr)-loaded deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) on bone healing in calvarial critical size defects (CSD) in rats. Material and methods Two circular bone defects (5 mm in diameter) were created in the calvaria of 42 rats. One of the defects, randomly chosen, was grafted with (a) DBB, (b) DBB loaded with 19.6 μg/g of Sr (DBB/Sr1), or (c) DBB loaded with 98.1 μg/g of Sr (DBB/Sr2). The other defect was left empty as negative control. Groups of seven animals f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aroni et al functionalized with Sr ions the surface of deproteinized bovine bone (Sr-DBB) to be used as implantable material for calvarial critical size defect in rats (5 mm in diameter), with two different doses of Sr loaded onto DBB particles: 19.6 μg/g and 98.1 μg/g. For both concentrations of Sr a fewer number of inflammatory cells in the bone defect site was observed and a higher amount of new bone formation was detected at 60 days when compared to Sr-free counterpart [ 115 ]. Also Elgali et al functionalized a deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) with SrHA powders with three levels of Ca substitution by Sr: 5% (SrHA005), 25% (SrHA025) and 50% (SrHA050).…”
Section: Biomaterials For Bone Tissue Engineering Approach and Their ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aroni et al functionalized with Sr ions the surface of deproteinized bovine bone (Sr-DBB) to be used as implantable material for calvarial critical size defect in rats (5 mm in diameter), with two different doses of Sr loaded onto DBB particles: 19.6 μg/g and 98.1 μg/g. For both concentrations of Sr a fewer number of inflammatory cells in the bone defect site was observed and a higher amount of new bone formation was detected at 60 days when compared to Sr-free counterpart [ 115 ]. Also Elgali et al functionalized a deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) with SrHA powders with three levels of Ca substitution by Sr: 5% (SrHA005), 25% (SrHA025) and 50% (SrHA050).…”
Section: Biomaterials For Bone Tissue Engineering Approach and Their ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One paper was not analyzed in the further steps of the review because it was in Japanese and there were no resources that allowed proper translation, 122 one paper was retracted 123 and three papers were excluded because they used non-synthetic CaPs. [124][125][126] In the meta-analysis, 45 papers with 133 quantitative bone formation comparisons and 20 studies with 57 quantitative remaining material comparisons could be included.…”
Section: Paper Identification and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sr was also found to possess inherent antimicrobial potential, in vitro, when incorporated in the formulation of bioglass [29,30]. Furthermore, Sr was shown to promote osseointegration of Ti implants and to have a positive effect on bone regeneration [31][32][33]. Sr has also been used as a treatment for osteoporosis, acting by inhibiting osteoclast activity and accelerating osteoblast proliferation [34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%