2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-013-0498-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loads on Sprayed Waterproof Tunnel Linings in Jointed Hard Rock: A Study Based on Norwegian Cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study of the possible loading of rock support linings based on sprayed concrete and rock bolts from the groundwater and rock mass has been undertaken (Holter 2014). The current practice with the use of rock mass classification according to the Q-system (NGI 2013) normally ensures rock stability with a high factor of safety.…”
Section: Loads From the Rock Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study of the possible loading of rock support linings based on sprayed concrete and rock bolts from the groundwater and rock mass has been undertaken (Holter 2014). The current practice with the use of rock mass classification according to the Q-system (NGI 2013) normally ensures rock stability with a high factor of safety.…”
Section: Loads From the Rock Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, possible water pressures acting on the tunnel lining need to be considered. A study including monitoring of groundwater pressures around sprayed concrete tunnel linings with drained inverts has been conducted (Holter 2014). These results indicate water pressures lower than the hydrostatic pressure in the immediate vicinity of the tunnel lining.…”
Section: Ground Water Induced Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, rock bolts are aimed to support the tunnels of motorways or railways for more than 100 years, whereas several months or a year can be enough for requirements of the mine production galleries (Kolymbas 2005;Hoek 2006;Holter 2014;Komurlu and Kesimal 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many practices have shown that preserving a certain thickness of the antioutburst layer in actual projects can effectively prevent the occurrence of water inrush disasters. For this reason, many studies have been performed on the issue of tunnel stability or safe rock stratum of water inrush disasters and can be divided into three main categories: empirical analysis [9,10], numerical simulation [11][12][13], and experimental analysis [14]. Gan et al [15] comprehensively considered the perturbation depth of the surrounding rock mass by drilling and blasting, the relaxation thickness of the surrounding rock after tunnel excavation, the expansion of waterbearing fissures under high water pressure, and the rock mass in situ stress state and magnitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%