In recent years microcredit has grown rapidly based on its promise to alleviate poverty and empower women. However, as the microcredit industry has grown, the initial emphasis on poverty alleviation and empowerment has changed; some critics argue that the industry now looks like commercial finance. This article explores these criticisms by comparing two microcredit programs in Chennai, India. Both programs work with the same population but take different approaches to credit delivery. Drawing from the participants' testimonies, the findings suggest that in general, the loans do not permanently move participants out of poverty; however, they do reduce some of the vulnerabilities associated with poverty.