2018
DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lobbying for Minimum Wages

Abstract: Using a common agency lobbying framework, this paper illustrates how the minimum wage set reflects the interaction between economic and political factors and under what circumstances will the policymaker be induced, through lobbying, to change the minimum wage. Specifically, when the labor demand elasticity is large, lobbying is successful in inducing the policymaker to set the minimum wage in accordance with her political ideology. However, the paper also shows the conditions under which lobbying will reverse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second consists in task-based modeling approaches that are more concentrated in wage polarization and explain it as a result of, for instance, automation decreasing the relative demand for middle-skilled workers, the ones typically executing tasks that are more susceptible to being automated (e.g., Acemoglu and Autor 2011;Autor and Restrepo 2018). The third is related to the theoretical connection between lobbying and wage inequality found in the literature (e.g., Lesica 2018;Prettner and Rostam-Afschar 2020). With this, we also recognize the importance of non-market factors such as lobbying in shaping inequality and do not neglect the overwhelming evidence of lobbying activities in countries with high wage inequality (e.g., the USA) and the strategic behavior of firms when taking decisions concerning productive and non-productive activities.…”
Section: Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second consists in task-based modeling approaches that are more concentrated in wage polarization and explain it as a result of, for instance, automation decreasing the relative demand for middle-skilled workers, the ones typically executing tasks that are more susceptible to being automated (e.g., Acemoglu and Autor 2011;Autor and Restrepo 2018). The third is related to the theoretical connection between lobbying and wage inequality found in the literature (e.g., Lesica 2018;Prettner and Rostam-Afschar 2020). With this, we also recognize the importance of non-market factors such as lobbying in shaping inequality and do not neglect the overwhelming evidence of lobbying activities in countries with high wage inequality (e.g., the USA) and the strategic behavior of firms when taking decisions concerning productive and non-productive activities.…”
Section: Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Prettner and Rostam-Afschar (2020) argue that a more stringent tax policy that relocates resources from unproductive lobbying with the objective of rent-seeking to productive activity contributes to higher economic growth and lower inequality. Lesica (2018) shows that lobbying can influence policymakers to set the minimum wage according to the ideology of the former provided that labor demand is sufficiently elastic. Moreover, lobbying has been pointed out to negatively affect technology adoption (Comin and Hobjin 2009) and innovation (Akcigit et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our paper is related to the literature on the political economy of the MW and labour market institutions (see, e.g. Cox and Oaxaca, 1982;Sobel, 1999;Saint-Paul, 1996 and2000;Rodrik, 1999;Adam and Moutos, 2011;Lesica, 2018). In contrast to these papers, the focus of the present paper is on whether there is a majority among workers in favour of the MW institution when another redistributive device is available.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%