2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lobe-specific Lymph Node Dissection in Clinical Stage IA Solid-dominant Non–small-cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in our previous retrospective study, the subcarinal and lower mediastinal lymph nodes were all negative when the tumour was located in the upper lobe and with a size of ≤2 cm, and the upper mediastinal lymph nodes were all negative when the tumour was located in the lower lobe and with a size of ≤2 cm 9. It reminded us that the lobe-specific lymph node metastasis pattern might be noticed, and the L-SLND might be practical, with comparable long-term survival and fewer postoperative complications 13. Therefore, we conducted a double-blind, randomised and parallel-controlled clinical trial to determine the preferred treatment between L-SLND and SLND for early-stage NSCLC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in our previous retrospective study, the subcarinal and lower mediastinal lymph nodes were all negative when the tumour was located in the upper lobe and with a size of ≤2 cm, and the upper mediastinal lymph nodes were all negative when the tumour was located in the lower lobe and with a size of ≤2 cm 9. It reminded us that the lobe-specific lymph node metastasis pattern might be noticed, and the L-SLND might be practical, with comparable long-term survival and fewer postoperative complications 13. Therefore, we conducted a double-blind, randomised and parallel-controlled clinical trial to determine the preferred treatment between L-SLND and SLND for early-stage NSCLC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“… 9 It reminded us that the lobe-specific lymph node metastasis pattern might be noticed, and the L-SLND might be practical, with comparable long-term survival and fewer postoperative complications. 13 Therefore, we conducted a double-blind, randomised and parallel-controlled clinical trial to determine the preferred treatment between L-SLND and SLND for early-stage NSCLC. We hypothesised that L-SLND was not inferior to SLND in safety and long-term oncological results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several authors have reported that L-SND and SND have similar effects in the dissection of stage IA NSCLC for the following reasons: (a) equivalent survival outcomes were detected between L-SND and SND, (b) rare frequency of deviant lymph node metastases from lobe-specific lymphatic pathways, and (c) dismal prognosis in cases of deviant metastases [4,22]. Recently, Zhao et al reported that L-SND had similar efficacy to SND in terms of survival, recurrence, lymph node dissection, and perioperative recovery in patients with clinical IA soliddominant NSCLC, as well as significant advantages in reducing operative complications (after propensity matching) [3]. Although further investigation is needed, our results add to the literature because they indicate that L-SND might be more suitable than SND, even in patients with CEA abnormality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, lobe-specific nodal dissection (L-SND) was recently considered as an alternative to SND for the dissection of early-staged NSCLCs. Several authors have reported lobe-specific lymph node (LN) spread patterns [3]. However, SND is considered an important option, based on the following: (a) subcarinal or upper mediastinal metastases are rarely identified in upper or lower lobe NSCLC [4] and (b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation