2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2008.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lobular neoplasia: Core needle breast biopsy underestimation of malignancy in relation to radiologic and pathologic features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
38
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the recent reports, the positive predictive value for malignancy is 44-61% for LN seen as BIRADS 3 tumors and 85-90% for LN viewed as BIRADS 4 lesion [47,48]. It is also increased for LCIS and tumors larger than 2 cm when compared to ALH and smaller lesions: 57.1% vs. 7.1%, and 100% vs. 31.2%, respectively [49]. Interestingly, there was significantly increased risk of IBC in the site of mass--forming LN reported in the study from Nottingham University Hospital, but the authors claimed that it was the result of biopsy missing the radiologically symptomatic lesion next to incidental LN [44].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the recent reports, the positive predictive value for malignancy is 44-61% for LN seen as BIRADS 3 tumors and 85-90% for LN viewed as BIRADS 4 lesion [47,48]. It is also increased for LCIS and tumors larger than 2 cm when compared to ALH and smaller lesions: 57.1% vs. 7.1%, and 100% vs. 31.2%, respectively [49]. Interestingly, there was significantly increased risk of IBC in the site of mass--forming LN reported in the study from Nottingham University Hospital, but the authors claimed that it was the result of biopsy missing the radiologically symptomatic lesion next to incidental LN [44].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upgrades were noted with all needle gauges and biopsy devices. There were several upgrades reported with vacuum-assisted Il-G probes and more than 10 cores of tissue, but with a vacuum-assisted 8 gauge probe (providing larger, less fragmented and less hematic specimens for histological evaluation), and 11-17 probes are associated to higher diagnostic accuracy and lower risk of underestimation (12,19) Although many studies focused their attention on atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation at VABB (6; 21-23), very few authors examined the efficacy of this technique in the characterization of ALH and LCIS lesions (24). Therefore, standardized recommendations for the management of lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia diagnosed on core biopsy have not been established because of disagreement (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Londero and Foster recommend surgical excision in case of percutaneous lobular neoplasia diagnosis because of its role as a precursor of breast cancer and because of the known risk of underestimation (12,18). Mahoney recommend that excisional surgical biopsy be performed in cases of lobular neoplasia diagnosed at stereotactic core needle biopsy to exclude a coexistent intraductal or invasive carcinoma that may be present in 19% of these patients (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2013;137:927-935; doi: 10.5858/ arpa.2012-0297-OA) L obular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) are infrequent findings in needle core biopsy samples, occurring in approximately 0.5% to 4% of needle core biopsies. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Finding LCIS/ALH as the primary, most clinically significant, pathologic diagnosis on core biopsy is even more uncommon. Currently, the surgical management of patients with a primary diagnosis of LCIS or ALH in needle core biopsy samples is controversial and without consensus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%