2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00686-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local and global contributions to shape discrimination

Abstract: Humans are remarkably sensitive in detecting small deviations from circularity. In tasks involving discrimination between closed contours, either circular in shape or defined by sinusoidal modulations of the circle radius, human performance has been shown to be limited by global processing. We assessed the amount of global pooling for different pattern shapes (different radial modulation frequencies, RF) when circular deformation was restricted to a fraction of the contour. The results show that the improvemen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

20
265
7
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(294 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
20
265
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Perceiving visual form initially requires accurate encoding of local orientation information, and then integrating separate features into global forms and segregating them from their backgrounds [42,67,69]. RF pattern discrimination is thought to tap intermediate stages of visual form processing [41], where separate features are pooled into global forms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceiving visual form initially requires accurate encoding of local orientation information, and then integrating separate features into global forms and segregating them from their backgrounds [42,67,69]. RF pattern discrimination is thought to tap intermediate stages of visual form processing [41], where separate features are pooled into global forms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human sensitivity for detecting subtle deformations of circular shapes is in the hyperacuity range. 25 Psychophysical, [26][27][28] monkey physiology, 29 and human fMRI 30 studies support the view that the high sensitivity may be a result of processing at intermediate, extrastriate stages. 31 According to the reduced inhibition hypothesis, if masking was a consequence of inhibition, migraineur performance should be similar to controls without a mask, but better than controls when masked.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Consistent with psychophysical and imaging studies, the output of RF templates should depend on a number of factors, including RF contour contrast, 28 amplitude, 26,30,36,55 radial frequency, 26,28,55 size, 56 and orientation. 36 We only consider contrast (c and c m ) and amplitude (A and A m ) here as the other parameters did not vary in the experiments:…”
Section: Appendix Gain-control Model For Maskingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The high sensitivity for discriminating amplitude modulations of radial frequency patterns provides strong evidence that shape perception is driven by a global mechanism that combines information across the circumference of the contour Habak, Wilkinson, & Wilson, 2006;Hess et al, 1999;Jeffrey, Wang, & Birch, 2002;Loffler et al, 2003;Schmidtmann et al, 2012;Wilkinson et al, 1998). This global pooling mechanism appears to be restricted to shapes with low radial frequency modulation (Schmidtmann et al, 2012;Wilkinson et al, 1998) and to be tuned to a specific type of shape and amplitude of radial modulations (Bell, Dickinson, & Badcock, 2008;Bell & Kingdom, 2009;Habak, Wilkinson, Zakher, & Wilson, 2004;Schmidtmann et al, 2012Schmidtmann et al, , 2013.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shape perception is an intermediate-level process that appears to integrate orientation information across space using both local and global mechanisms (e.g., Achtman, Hess, & Wang, 2003;Bell, Gheorghiu, Hess, & Kingdom, 2011;Hess, Wang, & Dakin, 1999;Loffler, 2008;Loffler, Wilson, & Wilkinson, 2003;Schmidtmann, Gordon, Bennett, & Loffler, 2013;Schmidtmann, Kennedy, Orbach, & Loffler, 2012;Wilkinson, Wilson, & Habak, 1998). Studies examining whether shape perception is altered in older age have found mixed results (Habak, Wilkinson, & Wilson, 2009;Mayhew & Kourtzi, 2013;McKendrick & Battista, 2013;McKendrick et al, 2010;Rivest, Kim, Intriligator, & Sharpe, 2004;Y.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%