2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local and global effects on the diurnal variation of the atmospheric electric field in South America by comparison with the Carnegie curve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements of the atmospheric electric field on land can be disturbed by local effects such as natural radioactivity, convective processes in the planetary boundary layer, and pollution among others (Nicoll et al., 2019). However, when these local effects are correctly identified it is possible to study the impact of global effects (Tacza et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements of the atmospheric electric field on land can be disturbed by local effects such as natural radioactivity, convective processes in the planetary boundary layer, and pollution among others (Nicoll et al., 2019). However, when these local effects are correctly identified it is possible to study the impact of global effects (Tacza et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above-mentioned effects motivates the continuous monitoring of the GEC, and this can be indirectly performed through atmospheric electric field (or potential gradient, PG 1 ) measurements in fair weather regions. In order to identify a global effect of the GEC on the PG measurements, a comparison can be made with the "universal" Carnegie curve, which is the average daily variation in PG in fair weather conditions 2 (Harrison, 2013;Tacza et al, 2020). It was obtained from the hourly average of PG measurements made over the world's ocean and represents the global daily contribution of the electrical activity in disturbed regions (Whipple, 1929;Peterson et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average fair weather variation of the PG calculated from 1920-1925 observations over the oceans on board of the Carnegie Institution of Washington research vessel "Carnegie" is known as the Carnegie curve (Parkinson and Torreson, 1931;Harrison, 2013). This curve is considered to reflect the variation of the diurnal activity of the global circuit and is often compared with the diurnal variation of the PG observed in fair weather conditions from other places on the globe (e.g., Kubicki et al, 2016;Nicoll et al, 2019;Tacza et al, 2020;Michnowski et al, 2021, and others). In the seasonal or annual variation many observations indicated a winter maximum in the atmospheric potential gradient compared to the summer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%