1985
DOI: 10.1002/qua.560270404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local behavior of the kinetic energy in density functional theory

Abstract: The local behavior of several approximate kinetic energy functionals is analyzed, for the case of free atoms and ions, by comparison with the local kinetic energy of Hartree-Fock theory. The atomic electron densities used are, in all cases, Hartree-Fock electron densities. The kinetic energy functional obtained by the gradient expansion method (with a small number of terms) is, locally, not very accurate, but its integrated value is fortuitously accurate, due to a strong cancellation of errors. Functionals whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…~Iarch and Bader (1980), Gazquez and Ludeiia (1981), ~Iarch and Pucci (1981a), J\Iarch (1982b) and Beznosjuk and Kryachko (1984) in completely independent ways (for a review, see also Ghosh and Deb, 1982;Parr, 1983Parr, , 1984Chattaraj and Deb, 1984;Kryachko, 1984band Ludeiia, 1984a). (2A-22) we see that the real kinetic energy density depends on the 1matrix in the following form is a diYergence term whose contribution to the total kinetic energy vanishes upon integration (Bader and Preston, 1969;Tal and Bader, 1978; see also Zorita et al, 1985). (2A-22) we see that the real kinetic energy density depends on the 1matrix in the following form is a diYergence term whose contribution to the total kinetic energy vanishes upon integration (Bader and Preston, 1969;Tal and Bader, 1978; see also Zorita et al, 1985).…”
Section: The Kinetic Energy Termmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…~Iarch and Bader (1980), Gazquez and Ludeiia (1981), ~Iarch and Pucci (1981a), J\Iarch (1982b) and Beznosjuk and Kryachko (1984) in completely independent ways (for a review, see also Ghosh and Deb, 1982;Parr, 1983Parr, , 1984Chattaraj and Deb, 1984;Kryachko, 1984band Ludeiia, 1984a). (2A-22) we see that the real kinetic energy density depends on the 1matrix in the following form is a diYergence term whose contribution to the total kinetic energy vanishes upon integration (Bader and Preston, 1969;Tal and Bader, 1978; see also Zorita et al, 1985). (2A-22) we see that the real kinetic energy density depends on the 1matrix in the following form is a diYergence term whose contribution to the total kinetic energy vanishes upon integration (Bader and Preston, 1969;Tal and Bader, 1978; see also Zorita et al, 1985).…”
Section: The Kinetic Energy Termmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This functional for the kinetic energy density of the valence electrons of a free atom or ion has been proposed and justified by several authors [26][27][28]. With the approximations of (20)- (22) the calculation of the ground state energy and ground state electron density is easily performed.…”
Section: Density Functional Theory Of the Electronegativity Of Atmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Assuming atom Y more electronegative than atom X, we first write the heat of formation of a diatomic X Y molecule as (28) where (2 is the number of electrons transferred from X to Y and R is the internuclear separation. The first two terms in (28) include the change in the energy of the atoms when their configuration is changed, the third term is the Madelung energy of the molecule and the fourth term is the covalent contribution to the XY bond. Minimization with respect to Q leads to…”
Section: Application To Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%