2018
DOI: 10.1364/ao.57.004267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local blur analysis and phase error correction method for fringe projection profilometry systems

Abstract: We introduce a flexible error correction method for fringe projection profilometry (FPP) systems in the presence of local blur phenomenon. Local blur caused by global light transport such as camera defocus, projector defocus, and subsurface scattering will cause significant systematic errors in FPP systems. Previous methods, which adopt high-frequency patterns to separate the direct and global components, fail when the global light phenomenon occurs locally. In this paper, the influence of local blur on phase … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After comprehensive consideration, the multi-frequency heterodyne principle was chosen for phase calculation, thanks to its good stability and accuracy. This principle superimposes two phase functions with different frequencies into a phase function with lower frequency, and combines the merits of three-frequency unwrapping and heterodyne method, namely, high measuring efficiency and excellent phase unwrapping accuracy [14][15][16]. The phase principal value p12 can be calculated by:…”
Section: Analysis Of Wrapped Phase and Dephasing Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After comprehensive consideration, the multi-frequency heterodyne principle was chosen for phase calculation, thanks to its good stability and accuracy. This principle superimposes two phase functions with different frequencies into a phase function with lower frequency, and combines the merits of three-frequency unwrapping and heterodyne method, namely, high measuring efficiency and excellent phase unwrapping accuracy [14][15][16]. The phase principal value p12 can be calculated by:…”
Section: Analysis Of Wrapped Phase and Dephasing Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ∆ φ r and ∆ φ are the errors of φ r and φ, respectively. These phase errors may derive from sensor noise [6,25], gamma distortion [26], or projector/camera defocus [27]. Sensor noise is not typically the main factor that influences phase unwrapping errors unless scanning at very low SNRs.…”
Section: Optimal Reference Frequency Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy is influenced by many factors. The defocus of projector influences the fringe patterns' amplitude and decreases the signal-to-noise ratio [2], which can be improved by increasing the phase-shifting steps [3] or selecting the fringe frequency properly [4]. The gamma effect of projector causes the fringe images to be nonsinusoidal waveforms and leads to phase error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%