2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5021130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local causal states and discrete coherent structures

Abstract: Coherent structures form spontaneously in nonlinear spatiotemporal systems and are found at all spatial scales in natural phenomena from laboratory hydrodynamic flows and chemical reactions to ocean, atmosphere, and planetary climate dynamics. Phenomenologically, they appear as key components that organize the macroscopic behaviors in such systems. Despite a century of effort, they have eluded rigorous analysis and empirical prediction, with progress being made only recently. As a step in this, we present a fo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…classification assignments of 'cylcone', 'atmospheric river', 'background', etc. ), for which an additional layer of analysis is needed on top of the local causal states [26]. From comparison with established Lagrangian Coherent Structure results we will now show that physically meaningful coherent structures are captured by our structural segmentation, and then we outline how extreme weather events may be extracted from structural segmentation of global climate data.…”
Section: Results: Structural Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…classification assignments of 'cylcone', 'atmospheric river', 'background', etc. ), for which an additional layer of analysis is needed on top of the local causal states [26]. From comparison with established Lagrangian Coherent Structure results we will now show that physically meaningful coherent structures are captured by our structural segmentation, and then we outline how extreme weather events may be extracted from structural segmentation of global climate data.…”
Section: Results: Structural Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Our method is also arguably much simpler than computational mechanics (used by Hanson and Crutchfield) which requires some reverse-engineering of the rule and the construction of a finite-state transducer to generate output symbols. Although full automation has been demonstrated, this method introduces significant overhead (Rupe and Crutchfield, 2018). On the other hand, our method is sensitive to the quality of statistical estimation of the frequency histogram (see equation ( 1)) and needs enough input examples to achieve a reasonable result -examples in Figure 5 and 6 used simulations with the width of 3000 cells, ran for 6000 timesteps to obtain reliable pattern frequency estimates.…”
Section: Results On Elementary Cellular Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means the learned representation is directly utilizable for discovering pattern and structure in the physical observable field. In particular, coherent structure in X are identified through locally broken symmetries in S [59].…”
Section: A Local Causal States -Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yellow boxes are new structural signatures of elliptic LCS discovered by DisCo. Because there is a single background state, colored white, in (c), all objects with a bounding box can be assigned a semantic label of coherent structure since they satisfy the local causal state definition given in [59] as spatially localized, temporally persistent deviations from generalized spacetime symmetries (i.e. local causal state symmetries).…”
Section: A 2d Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%