Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3437963.3441808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Collaborative Autoencoders

Abstract: Top-recommendation is a challenging problem because complex and sparse user-item interactions should be adequately addressed to achieve high-quality recommendation results. The local latent factor approach has been successfully used with multiple local models to capture diverse user preferences with different subcommunities. However, previous studies have not fully explored the potential of local models, and failed to identify many small and coherent sub-communities. In this paper, we present Local Collaborati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Random pruning is a simple baseline, i.e., the parameters are randomly removed under the given compression ratio. This result indicates that the learned relationship between items is disentangled with the locality, as observed in existing studies [4,[27][28][29][30]. Owing to this valuable property, the compressed S-Walk is memory-efficient, suitable for low-resource devices, e.g., mobile and embedded applications.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Scalabilitysupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Random pruning is a simple baseline, i.e., the parameters are randomly removed under the given compression ratio. This result indicates that the learned relationship between items is disentangled with the locality, as observed in existing studies [4,[27][28][29][30]. Owing to this valuable property, the compressed S-Walk is memory-efficient, suitable for low-resource devices, e.g., mobile and embedded applications.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Scalabilitysupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Randomly divide the training data will destroy the collaborative information which could damage the recommendation performance. One promising approach is using community detection or clustering methods [15,23,34]. However, due to the underlying structure of real-world data, these methods may lead to highly unbalanced data partition.…”
Section: Challenges Of Recommendation Unlearningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we have mentioned before, the data used for recommendation tasks usually contains rich collaborative information. To preserve the collaborative information, one promising approach is to rely on community detection and clustering methods [15,23,34]. However, direct application of them may lead to highly unbalanced data partition.…”
Section: Balanced Data Partitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Collaborative filtering (CF) [1,7,22,36] is the most prevalent technique for building commercial recommender systems. CF typically utilizes two types of user feedback: explicit and implicit feedback.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%