Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2566486.2567970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local collaborative ranking

Abstract: Personalized recommendation systems are used in a wide variety of applications such as electronic commerce, social networks, web search, and more. Collaborative filtering approaches to recommendation systems typically assume that the rating matrix (e.g., movie ratings by viewers) is lowrank. In this paper, we examine an alternative approach in which the rating matrix is locally low-rank. Concretely, we assume that the rating matrix is low-rank within certain neighborhoods of the metric space defined by (user, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
76
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, ranking based objective function has shown to be more effective in giving better recommendation as shown in [11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, ranking based objective function has shown to be more effective in giving better recommendation as shown in [11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by the analogy between query-document relations in IR and user-item relations in recommender systems, many CR approaches have been proposed over the past few years for personalized recommendations [5,20,22,29,34,35,36,38,39]. The majority of them optimize one of the (top-N) ranking evaluation metrics by exploiting advances in structured estimation [37] that minimize convex upper bounds of the loss functions based on these metrics [21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that, they used a novel approach of generating features for the LTR task using CF techniques, i.e., neighborhood-based and modelbased techniques, so that the problem can be transformed to a classic pairwise LTR problem. Recently, [22] introduced a method for Local Collaborative Ranking (LCR) where ideas of local low-rank matrix approximation were applied to the pairwise ranking loss minimization framework. A special case of this framework is Global Collaborative Ranking (GCR) where global low-rank structure is assumed, as is usually done in the ranking counterpart of Probabilistic Matrix Factorization (PMF)-type methods [1,25,31,33], although equal importance is given to the whole ranked list.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Latent Factor Models (LFM) based on Matrix Factorization (MF) have gained great popularity because they usually have achieved stateof-the-art performance in some benchmark datasets [18]. A variety of MF algorithms have been proposed, such as Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) [7], Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) [8], Max-Margin Matrix Factorization (MMMF) [14], Probabilistic Matrix Factorization (PMF) [11], and Local Matrix Factorization (LMF) [9]. They aim at learning latent factors from user-item matrices to make recommendation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%