2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2016.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local conditions for global stability in the space of codons of the genetic code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence the error minimization theory of code evolution, under which the structure of the code is determined by selection for robustness to errors. Extensive quantitative analyses that employed cost functions differently derived from physico-chemical properties of amino acids have shown that the code is indeed highly resilient, with the probability to pick an equally robust random code being on the order of 10 −7 –10 −8 [14,15,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68]. Obviously, however, among the ~10 84 possible random codes, there is a huge number with a higher degree of error minimization than the SGC.…”
Section: The Three Principal Scenarios Of the Code Origin And Evolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the error minimization theory of code evolution, under which the structure of the code is determined by selection for robustness to errors. Extensive quantitative analyses that employed cost functions differently derived from physico-chemical properties of amino acids have shown that the code is indeed highly resilient, with the probability to pick an equally robust random code being on the order of 10 −7 –10 −8 [14,15,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68]. Obviously, however, among the ~10 84 possible random codes, there is a huge number with a higher degree of error minimization than the SGC.…”
Section: The Three Principal Scenarios Of the Code Origin And Evolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the error minimization theory of code evolution, under which the structure of the code is determined by selection for robustness to errors. Extensive quantitative analyses that employed cost functions differently derived from physico-chemical properties of amino acids have shown that the code is indeed highly resilient, with the probability to pick an equally robust random code being on the order of 10 -7 -10 -8 [14,15,[61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68]. Obviously, however, among the ~10 84 possible random codes, there is a huge number with a higher degree of error minimization than the SGC.…”
Section: The Three Principal Scenarios Of the Code Origin And Evolutimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, considering that sometimes code errors could be important for developing new cellular adaptive properties, perhaps genetic code evolution, rather than a way of optimizing stability, tended to optimize the balance between stability and adaptability. According to an evolutionary increase in stability, it has been found that the errors associated with the standard genetic code are considerably smaller than most random codes, although its achieved stability is not the best possible (Błażej et al 2018(Błażej et al , 2016Buhrman et al 2011;Freeland and Hurst 1998;Goldman 1993;Hurst 1991, 1999;Novozhilov et al 2007;Salinas et al 2016;Santos and Monteagudo 2010;Wnętrzak et al 2018Wnętrzak et al , 2019. The remarkable stability of the standard genetic code, besides being a driving force through the selection pressure, may have been a consequence of the expansion of the genetic code by mean of similar mechanism of codon assignments to physicochemically similar amino acids (Crick 1968;Koonin 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%