2016
DOI: 10.1111/twec.12426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Content Requirements Versus Tariff Equivalents: How We Measure Matters

Abstract: This article develops a mechanism to measure the impact of local content requirements as quantitative restrictions. We compare effects of the novel quantitative approach to the effects of a tariff equivalent, which is more traditionally used to analyse these types of policies. Local content requirements increase output and value added in the affected sector, but at the expense of other sectors, leading to declines in GDP and trade across the economy. Comparing the two modelling approaches, the differences in o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results articulate that there has been a significant difference in the level of GVC backward participation in ASEAN economies between the early adopters and the latecomers. Apart from the discussion on trade in value-added by measuring the domestic- and foreign-added content, the criticality of local content requirement (LCR) in trade has also been highlighted in the study by Flaig and Stone (2017). The study has quantitatively validated that LCR can be a barrier to trade.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results articulate that there has been a significant difference in the level of GVC backward participation in ASEAN economies between the early adopters and the latecomers. Apart from the discussion on trade in value-added by measuring the domestic- and foreign-added content, the criticality of local content requirement (LCR) in trade has also been highlighted in the study by Flaig and Stone (2017). The study has quantitatively validated that LCR can be a barrier to trade.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative analysis using computable general equilibrium (CGE) model shows that LCR can affect trade. Even if the domestic suppliers increase the share, it can lead to an increased domestic price which ultimately leads to an increase in input price and fall in exports (Flaig and Stone, 2017). By constructing GVC bargaining power index Li et al (2022) measured the GVC division position by using bilateral stochastic frontier analysis model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies aimed to measure the impact of LCR policy for the host economy usually employ an Input-Output (I-O) modeling framework, use Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) models [22] or the Competitive General Equilibrium (CGE) models [23]. But given the lack of regional I-O tables in Russia, this paper attempts to offer a specific approach based on a statistical simulation model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fugazza and Maur (2008) noted serious analytical mistakes from loose specifications of NTMs in CGE modelling. Thus, the choice of modelling approach 41 strongly affects outcomes in terms of size, direction of welfare effects and allocation, even when using the same underlying data (Fugazza and Maur, 2008, Walmsley and Minor, 2016, Flaig and Stone, 2017. For example, the use of ad-valorem tariff equivalents might wrongly create government revenue while efficiency approaches yield positive effects by design (especially when implemented in anon-discriminatory way) and are criticized for strong effects on GDP.…”
Section: Studies-united States International Trade Commission (Itc-gr...mentioning
confidence: 99%