1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(96)01858-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local control and survival in spinal cord compression from lymphoma and myeloma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemotherapy may be administered in addition to radiotherapy if MESCC is caused by chemo sensitive tumors such as hematological or germcell malignancies. [68][69][70] In a series of 48 lymphoma patients who received either radiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone or both regimens, the 10year local control rates were 50%, 46% and 76%, respectively. 68 In another series of 48 patients withlymphoma or myeloma, no further progression of neurologic symptoms was observed in 58% of patients after radiotherapy alone and in 75% of patients after radiotherapy plus chemotherapy.…”
Section: Glucocorticoid Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemotherapy may be administered in addition to radiotherapy if MESCC is caused by chemo sensitive tumors such as hematological or germcell malignancies. [68][69][70] In a series of 48 lymphoma patients who received either radiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone or both regimens, the 10year local control rates were 50%, 46% and 76%, respectively. 68 In another series of 48 patients withlymphoma or myeloma, no further progression of neurologic symptoms was observed in 58% of patients after radiotherapy alone and in 75% of patients after radiotherapy plus chemotherapy.…”
Section: Glucocorticoid Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No significant differences could be observed for gender, distribution of favorable (myeloma, lymphoma, breast cancer) or unfavorable (cancer of unknown primary, lung cancer) tumors [5,16,27,30], pre-treatment ambulatory rates, and the time of developing motor deficits before radiotherapy. The two groups were also comparably balanced for age, performance status, and pre-treatment functional score (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…About 3 months after RT, 40 patients had to be excluded from follow-up (cancer-related deaths 31, insufficient data 9). Tables 1 and 2 show that the groups A (1–7 days), B (8–14 days), and C (>14 days) were comparably balanced for radiation parameters, for ambulatory status before RT, and for distribution of primary tumors including the distribution of favorable (breast cancer, myeloma, lymphoma) and unfavorable (lung cancer, cancer of unknown primary) tumors [2, 3, 5, 14]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%