2002
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2002.8504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Corrosion of Magnesia–Chrome Refractories Driven by Marangoni Convection at the Slag–Metal Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even in the case of decreasing interfacial tension by the dissolution of the refractory into the slag, local corrosion also occurs. 6) Pötschke and Brüggmann 7) reported that an estimation of the corrosion of a refractory caused by Marangoni flow is in good agreement with experimental results. However, fundamental solutions based on this mechanism have yet to be established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Even in the case of decreasing interfacial tension by the dissolution of the refractory into the slag, local corrosion also occurs. 6) Pötschke and Brüggmann 7) reported that an estimation of the corrosion of a refractory caused by Marangoni flow is in good agreement with experimental results. However, fundamental solutions based on this mechanism have yet to be established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The fragments of ZrSiO 4 , formed as a result of preheating at the glaze/ refractory interface were observed to float up to the top of the glaze layer. Marangoni phenomenon attributed to the differential surface tension developed across the layer of glaze is most likely responsible for the removal of ZrSiO 4 from the interfacial region to the free surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that ZrO 2 -graphite dissolves at a much faster rate preferentially at the flux-metal interface. This phenomenon may be explained by the difference in the interfacial energy [1,13] between pairs, namely, metal-graphite, metal-zirconia, flux-graphite, and flux-zirconia. When the rod is initially dipped, graphite will preferentially dissolve into the metal at the surface that is in contact with the metal, and zirconia into the flux at the surface that is in contact with the flux.…”
Section: Some Considerations On Necking Phenomenon Of the Rod At The mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This may imply that there is another factor that is more dominant than rotation of the rod during the dissolution. One possible explanation is Marangoni flow [12][13][14], which is caused by the gradient of concentration, surface tensions, etc. and leads to shear stress on the rod.…”
Section: Dissolution Rate Of Zirconia Rodmentioning
confidence: 99%