2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-020-04226-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local ecological knowledge of shellfish collectors in an extractivist reserve, Northeast Brazil: implications for co-management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 79 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Notohamijoyo et al [101], in Indonesia, subsidy programs for small-scale fisheries were demonstrated to create benefits to the well-being of the fishers and fisheries' sustainability when focused on fishing vessels, vessel machines, and environmentally friendly fishing gear. From a co-management perspective, unemployment insurance subsidy implementation was suggested by shellfish harvesters to improve fishery sustainability during the closed period in northeast Brazil [102]. Furthermore, Rodriguez-Canul et al [103] advocated a subsidies program set up by the Mexican federal government to improve women's inclusion in fishing organisations for protected area development and conservation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Notohamijoyo et al [101], in Indonesia, subsidy programs for small-scale fisheries were demonstrated to create benefits to the well-being of the fishers and fisheries' sustainability when focused on fishing vessels, vessel machines, and environmentally friendly fishing gear. From a co-management perspective, unemployment insurance subsidy implementation was suggested by shellfish harvesters to improve fishery sustainability during the closed period in northeast Brazil [102]. Furthermore, Rodriguez-Canul et al [103] advocated a subsidies program set up by the Mexican federal government to improve women's inclusion in fishing organisations for protected area development and conservation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%