2022
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.788885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Electrical Impedance Mapping of the Atria: Conclusions on Substrate Properties and Confounding Factors

Abstract: The treatment of atrial fibrillation and other cardiac arrhythmias as a major cause of cardiovascular hospitalization has remained a challenge predominantly for patients with severely remodeled substrate. Individualized ablation strategies are extremely important both for pulmonary vein isolation and subsequent ablations. Current approaches to identifying arrhythmogenic regions rely on electrogram-based features such as activation time and voltage. Novel technologies now enable clinical assessment of the local… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The elevation of LI in tissue contact above the bloodpool LI ranged from 14 Ω for 0 mm distance to the tissue, i.e. 0 g so-called "contact force", to 33 Ω for −2 mm distance to the tissue and compared well to clinically observed mean ranges between 16 Ω and 20 Ω [27] for the IntellaNav MiFi™ OI. The simulated upper bound for an immersion depth of 2 mm thus likely overestimates the LI for clinical mean contact force applications due to the disregard of realistic tissue deformation.…”
Section: Catheter Tissue Interactionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The elevation of LI in tissue contact above the bloodpool LI ranged from 14 Ω for 0 mm distance to the tissue, i.e. 0 g so-called "contact force", to 33 Ω for −2 mm distance to the tissue and compared well to clinically observed mean ranges between 16 Ω and 20 Ω [27] for the IntellaNav MiFi™ OI. The simulated upper bound for an immersion depth of 2 mm thus likely overestimates the LI for clinical mean contact force applications due to the disregard of realistic tissue deformation.…”
Section: Catheter Tissue Interactionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In clinical setups, the inflation and deflation of the lungs is an additional confounding factor with evident impact on the LI measurement [27] due to the close proximity of the lungs to selected parts of the cardiac chambers. While the conductivity of inflated lungs is reported to be 0.0954 S m at 14.5 kHz, the conductivity increases to 0.247 S m in deflated state [21].…”
Section: F Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, healthy clinical data shows a drop at 3 g and 5 g, which was not observed in silico but could be explained due to the extremely difficulty getting exact CF values below 10 g measured by human. However, trends of clinical data followed the expected be- havior as scar tissue usually presents lower LI values than healthy tissue [10]. In silico healthy values showed more similar results when comparing with clinical data than scar tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Combination of CF and LI monitoring may allow to improve ablation procedures in regions of low voltage: 1) LI mapping may complement electrogram-based substrate maps potentially facilitating selection of optimal ablation sites within previously ablated areas ( Unger et al, 2021 ). This is supported by our findings confirming baseline LI as a better predictor for a ∆LI > 20 Ω compared to local voltage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%