Local environmental NGO roles in biodiversity governance: a Czech-German comparison

Abstract

Recently, the role of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs)s in environmental governance has been widely investigated, especially regarding the issue of mandatory public participation in policy-making within a European context. This paper aims to redirect scientific attention from their pure participation to their field actions, i.e., to the role they play in actual natural resource management, especially at the local level, and reframe local environmental NGO roles and positions based on the criteria for scale and influence. More specifically, this paper seeks to identify factors that promote NGOs as effective complements in the protection of state biodiversity and stresses local impacts of different governance schemes.Determining factors were investigated through a series of in-depth case studies undertaken in the Czech-German border region of the eastern Krušné hory Mts. (Erzgebirge, Ore Mts.). Rather than a quantitatively oriented survey among NGOs, this study focused primarily on a specific territory and, subsequently, on the identification of relevant actor performance (including NGO representatives) within this territory. The method applied for comparison was the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework (IAD Framework). This design enabled a comparison of different social practices in the homogeneous ecosystem present on both sides of the border and captured the influence of specific social and historical cross-border features on environmental NGO performance.

Environmental non-governmental organizations and air-pollution governance: Empirical evidence from OECD countries

“…To sum up, there are several ways for ENGOs to participate in Environmental Governance: first, ENGOs can raise their environmental awareness by holding environmental campaigns [ 15 ]; second, if their domestic ENGOs are relatively weak, they can improve their environmental discourse right by cooperating with international ENGOs in other developed countries [ 13 ]; third, in order to better participate in environmental governance, ENGOs take the initiative to establish interactive relations with enterprises and the government, so as to promote the realization of the normal functions of ENGOs [ 16 , 17 ]; fourth, ENGOs cooperate with media organizations to transmit environmental information to the public through the media, and improve the public’s environmental awareness [ 18 ]; fifth, for some countries with relatively small land area, environmental governance needs transnational cooperation, and ENGOs also need to cooperate closely with ENGOs in other countries to jointly deal with cross-border pollution problems [ 16 , 19 – 21 ]; Sixth, ENGOs regularly publish reports on the environmental behavior of the government or enterprises to the public through information disclosure, so as to promote the government and enterprises to adopt more green environmental behavior [ 22 – 25 ]. With the growth of ENGOs, the fields of different ENGOs are constantly subdivided, and the ways to ENGOs participate in environmental governance are constantly changing.…”

Basaltic Dyke with Specific Volcanogenic Structures and Its Geomorphic Evolution: Unique Geoheritage of the Faroe Islands (North Atlantic Ocean)

“…In addition, the necessity for local-based or community-based tourism and nature conservation management is evident (cf. Ceballos-Lascurain 1996;Slavíková et al 2017) in remote and sparsely populated tourist destinations such as the Faroe Islands.…”

Desiccation of Lake Chad as a cause of security instability in the Sahel region

“…As the previous research suggests, the desiccation of water sources in sub-Saharan Africa and scarcity of water serve as environmental push elements causing migration of thousands of people (Lonergan 1998). Deteriorating security situation then makes it difficult for environmental NGOs to work effectively in order to stop water resources degradation (Slavíková et al 2017). Moreover, environmental problems connected to drylands and scarcity of water resources may serve as causal factors of conflicts (Spiess 2005, p. 831).…”