2013
DOI: 10.1051/ps/2011154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local estimation of the Hurst index of multifractional Brownian motion by increment ratio statistic method

Abstract: We investigate here the Central Limit Theorem of the Increment Ratio Statistic of a multifractional Brownian motion, leading to a CLT for the time varying Hurst index. The proofs are quite simple relying on Breuer-Major theorems and an original freezing of time strategy. A simulation study shows the goodness of fit of this estimator.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are so far a number of estimation strategies existing in literature. We refer to [17,18,10,5,26,39] and the references therein.…”
Section: A General Class Of Multifractional Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are so far a number of estimation strategies existing in literature. We refer to [17,18,10,5,26,39] and the references therein.…”
Section: A General Class Of Multifractional Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coeurjolly [17,18] estimates the PHE of an mBm, starting from an observed discrete sample path of that mBm, using the LGQV approach (see also [16]). Bertrand et al [10] study the same estimation problem as in [17,18], using the nonparametric estimation approach -increment ratio (IR) statistic method.…”
Section: A General Class Of Multifractional Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end we take Φ 1 (x) = x to let Y be an mBm. By using the MATLAB functions VariaIR MBM (eta,n,tot) and HestIR(R,p) obtained from http://samm.univ-paris1.fr/-Jean-Marc-Bardet, we also provide the empirical mean and standard deviation (based on 100 independent scenarios of mBm and α = 0.5) of IR2 estimators as follows: Table 2: Mean and std of the IR2 estimators with n = 2 13 and t 0 = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9.…”
Section: In Both H Ir2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that in the function VariaIR MBM(eta,n,tot), the mBm was previously generated using the Choleski decomposition of the covariance matrix, so that the sample size n is limited to 6000. However here we have generated the mBm using Wood & Chan circulant matrix, some krigging and a prequantification (see Chan and Wood 1998;Barrière 2007), the sample size n can be thus taken as 2 13 = 8192. The empirical comparison shows no significant difference between the performances of H Y,2 Jn ,n (t 0 ) and H IR2 n,α (t 0 ), except that IR2 estimator has less variance.…”
Section: In Both H Ir2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation