2018
DOI: 10.7249/rr2411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Evaluation Report for Los Angeles County's Mentally Ill Offender Crime Reduction (MIOCR) Program

Abstract: Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For infor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Successful interventions are published on the College of Policing website in the Crime Reduction Toolkit. The toolkit serves as the professional knowledge base (Hunter et al, 2017;Mitchell, 2019). To date there are over 60 interventions listed on the Crime Reduction Toolkit, these include hot spots policing, focused deterrence, Problem Oriented Policing and drink drive stops (Mitchell and Lewis, 2017;Telep and Somers, 2019;College of Policing, 2021a).…”
Section: Creating the Police Knowledgebasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Successful interventions are published on the College of Policing website in the Crime Reduction Toolkit. The toolkit serves as the professional knowledge base (Hunter et al, 2017;Mitchell, 2019). To date there are over 60 interventions listed on the Crime Reduction Toolkit, these include hot spots policing, focused deterrence, Problem Oriented Policing and drink drive stops (Mitchell and Lewis, 2017;Telep and Somers, 2019;College of Policing, 2021a).…”
Section: Creating the Police Knowledgebasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Government have provided funding through the Economic and Social Research Council, parts of the university sector have worked with the College of Policing to create and share knowledge about what works in policing (Fleming and Wingrove, 2017;Hunter et al, 2019). The Society for Evidence Based Policing (SEBP) was founded by a group of UK police officers in 2010 to promote the use of evidence-based policing and it now has over 2800 members (Hunter et al, 2017;Murray, 2019). Since then, the SEBP and the College of Policing have become key players in both creating and promoting the use of evidencebased policing within UK police forces (Heaton and Tong, 2015).…”
Section: Creating the Police Knowledgebasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, consultation of the Crime Reduction Toolkit does not mean it was used or whether when used it was used sensibly. Indeed, evidence is currently lacking on the extent to which the Crime Reduction Toolkit has effected positive change in policing and crime reduction (Hunter, May & Hough, 2017). To our knowledge, however, there is as yet no formal methodology for determining better or worse specific problem guides.…”
Section: Decision Makers and Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This chapter focuses on one member of the What Works Network: The What Works Centre for Crime Reduction (WWCCR) based in the College of Policing, the professional body for policing in England and Wales responsible for setting the standards for police recruitment, training, and development. We describe the rationale, methods and findings from a three-year research program led by University College London which supported the early work of the WWCCR (for a fuller discussion see Hunter, May & Hough, 2017). Our involvement in that research program related mainly to a systematic effort to identify, appraise, standardize, and distill research evidence for the purposes of informing policy and practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%