Local Field Potentials in Deep Brain Stimulation: Investigation of the Most Cited Articles

Mishra, Akash; Shah, Harshal A.; McBriar, Joshua D.; Zamor, Chris; Mammis, Antonios

doi:10.1016/j.wnsx.2022.100140

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Hu et al 25 discussed the bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles. Listick et al 11 evaluated the bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles on DBS treatment of dystonia, and Mishra et al 26 conducted bibliometric analyses of the 84 most cited articles on the subject of Local Field Potentials in DBS. In the current study, 5939 articles were analysed, so there can be said to be an advantage over other studies in respect of the scope and time period.…”

Section: Co-citation Analysis On Dbsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Deep brain stimulation from past to future: research trends and global outcomes with bibliometric analysis during 1980-2022

ELİAÇIK,

AYKAÇ

2023

J Health Sci Med /JHSM /jhsm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims: We aimed to summarize the intellectual structure of the deep brain stimulation (DBS), to reveal the global productivity, to identify and map the latest trends by analysing the social and structural relationships between the different research components of scientific articles published on DBS. Methods: 5939 articles on DBS published during 1980 and 2022 were analysed utilized various statistical approaches. Network visualization maps were created to reveal trend topics, citation analysis, and international collaborations. Spearman's correlation analysis was used for correlation investigations. The exponential smoothing predictor was used to determine the article productivity trend. Results: The most prolific author on DBS was Okun, Michael S. (209 articles) and the most productive institution was the University of Toronto (n=283). The top 3 productive countries were United States of America (n=2371, 39.9%), Germany (910, 15.3%), and United Kingdom (550, 9.2%). From past to present, the most studied topics were Parkinson's disease, subthalamic nucleus DBS, dystonia, globus pallidus, essential tremor, movement disorders, thalamus, functional neurosurgery, neuromodulation, depression, obsessive compulsive disorder, basal ganglia. Conclusion: The primary trend topics that have been studied more in recent years are tractography, freezing of gait, Parkinson’s disease, Parkinson&#8217, Parkinson#apos, autonomy, self, machine learning, non-motor symptoms, functional connectivity, globus pallidus interna, volume of tissue activated, adaptive deep brain stimulation, beta oscillations, medial forebrain bundle, and local field potential. The secondery trend topics were optogenetics, pediatric, frameless, closed-loop DBS, refractory epilepsy, satellite broadcasting, asleep DBS, optimization, biomarker, directional Leeds, nucleus bassals of meynert, personality, authenticity, and anterior nucleus of thalamus.

show abstract

Section: Co-citation Analysis On Dbsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Deep brain stimulation from past to future: research trends and global outcomes with bibliometric analysis during 1980-2022

ELİAÇIK,

AYKAÇ

2023

J Health Sci Med /JHSM /jhsm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A Method for Electrical Stimulus Artifact Removal Exploiting Neural Refractoriness: Validation by Contrasting Cathodic and Anodic Stimulation

Nakhmani,

Block,

Awad

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To present a novel method for removing stimulus transient that exploits the absolute refractory period of electrically excitable neural tissues. Background: Electrical stimulation often generates significant signal artifacts that can obscure important physiological signals. Removal of the artifact and understanding latent information from these signals could provide objective measures of circuit engagement, potentially driving advancements in neuromodulation research and therapies. Methods: We conducted intracranial physiology studies on five consecutive patients with Parkin-son's disease who underwent deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery as part of their routine care. Monopolar stimuli (either cathodic or anodic) were delivered in pairs through the DBS electrode across a range of inter-stimulus intervals. Recordings from adjacent unused electrode contacts used broadband sampling and precise synchronization to generate a robust template for the stimulus transient during the absolute refractory period. These templates of stimulus transient were then subtracted from recordings at different intervals to extract and analyze the residual neural potentials. Results: After artifact removal, the residual signals exhibited absolute and relative refractory periods with timing indicative of neural activity. Cathodic and anodic DBS pulses generated distinct patterns of local tissue activation, showing phase independence from the prior stimulus. The earliest detectable neural responses occurred at short peak latencies (ranging from 0.19 to 0.38 ms post-stimulus) and were completely or partially obscured by the stimulus artifact prior to removal. Cathodic stimuli produced stronger local tissue responses than anodic stimuli, aligning with clinical observations of lower activation thresholds for cathodic stimulation. However, cathodic and anodic pulses induced artifact patterns that were equivalent but opposite. Interpretation: The proposed artifact removal technique enhances prior approaches by allowing direct measurement of local tissue responses without requirements for stimulus polarity reversal, template scaling, or specialized filters. This approach could be integrated into future neuromodulation systems to visualize stimulus-evoked neural potentials that would otherwise be obscured by stimulus artifacts.

show abstract

Bibliometric analysis on Deep Brain StimulationProcedures Conducted Between 2000-2023

Çakır,

Akar

2024

Meandros Medical and Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a treatment method that uses electrodes to stimulate the brain, affecting brain activity and potentially causing medical conditions. It is commonly used to treat Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, dystonia, epilepsy, Tourette syndrome, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. This bibliometric study examines advanced bibliometric parameters in articles published since 2000, focusing on trends in publishing organizations, countries, funding sources, international collaborations, and trend keywords. Materials and Methods: We have searched the Web of Science database to find articles on DBS which published since 2000. The search was performed by using the MESH keywords releated to "Deep brain stimulation". Results: This study presents a comprehensive analysis of 4,601 articles on Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) from 2000 to 2023, focusing on publication trends, properties, funding, country contributions, and international collaborations. Noteworthy findings include a peak of 413 publications in 2020 and 14,992 citations in 2021. The overall trajectory demonstrates a significant increase in scientific output, with an average of 31.9 citations per article. Publication properties reveal diverse access categories, including 66 Early Access and 2,136 Open Access articles. The majority of records are in the Science Citation Index Expanded (93.980%). Clinical Neurology dominates research topics with 63.464% representation. Funding sources highlight major contributions from the USA, Germany, and China. The USA leads in research output, while the University of Toronto tops institutions. Major journals include "Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery" and "Movement Disorders." Keyword analysis emphasizes common themes like "deep brain stimulation" and "Parkinson's disease." International collaborations involve researchers from 75 countries, with the USA leading in total link strength. This study contributes valuable insights into the global landscape of DBS research. Conclusion: This analysis highlights the dynamic nature of Deep Brain Stimulation research, highlighting global collaboration and diverse topics, emphasizing the crucial role of key countries, institutions, and journals.

show abstract

Local Field Potentials in Deep Brain Stimulation: Investigation of the Most Cited Articles

Cited by 3 publications

References 48 publications

Deep brain stimulation from past to future: research trends and global outcomes with bibliometric analysis during 1980-2022

Deep brain stimulation from past to future: research trends and global outcomes with bibliometric analysis during 1980-2022

A Method for Electrical Stimulus Artifact Removal Exploiting Neural Refractoriness: Validation by Contrasting Cathodic and Anodic Stimulation

Bibliometric analysis on Deep Brain StimulationProcedures Conducted Between 2000-2023

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About