2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/ab6ecb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local geometric error corrections for a metrological scanning probe microscope

Abstract: A local geometric error correction method is developed for a metrological scanning probe microscope. The method corrects geometric errors in stage displacements using the interferometric measurements of angular position and known geometric offsets. Local and global error correction methods are considered and general scaling dependences on the number of measured steps or points are derived and compared. For the local method, the total uncertainty scales the same or decreases with a sufficient number of measurem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This unavoidably leads to incorrect local uncertainty estimates where the contributing uncertainties are convoluted in the reported values. In the case of measurements obtained by the mSPM, the measurement uncertainties originating from the geometrical measurement parameters are experimentally quantifiable due to metrological evaluation of the interferometric system combined with complete characterisation of all six degrees of freedom of the stage movement [11]. The local uncertainty values corresponding to the raw height data from figure 4(a) are plotted in figure 6(a).…”
Section: Visualisation Of Measurement Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This unavoidably leads to incorrect local uncertainty estimates where the contributing uncertainties are convoluted in the reported values. In the case of measurements obtained by the mSPM, the measurement uncertainties originating from the geometrical measurement parameters are experimentally quantifiable due to metrological evaluation of the interferometric system combined with complete characterisation of all six degrees of freedom of the stage movement [11]. The local uncertainty values corresponding to the raw height data from figure 4(a) are plotted in figure 6(a).…”
Section: Visualisation Of Measurement Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%