2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2014.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local government officials׳ views on intersectoral collaboration within their organization – A qualitative exploration

Abstract: Objectives: Intersectoral collaboration (ISC) is defined as collaboration between health and non-health local government officials and is a prerequisite for the development of integrated policies that address wicked public health problems. In practice, ISC has proven to be problematic, which might be related to differing views on ISC across various policy sectors. Therefore, our objective was to explore local officials' views on ISC.Methods: We interviewed 19 officials responsible for 10 different policy secto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These networks and the growing body of literature on the topic support their application to overcome challenges facing contemporary public management and goals [ 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ]. However, managing networks does not come without challenges and does require “network leaders” (the person tasked to manage and facilitate PHCs) to develop skills that navigate issues of accountability, autonomy, and organizational culture and mission differences [ 10 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These networks and the growing body of literature on the topic support their application to overcome challenges facing contemporary public management and goals [ 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ]. However, managing networks does not come without challenges and does require “network leaders” (the person tasked to manage and facilitate PHCs) to develop skills that navigate issues of accountability, autonomy, and organizational culture and mission differences [ 10 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Listed as one of the Ten Essential Public Health Services, inter-organizational networks, referred to herein as public health collaboratives (PHCs), represent an essential function of public health agencies. Public health now includes traditional health partners, “but also entities that operate outside the traditional sphere of healthcare, such as faith-based and other non-health community-based organizations, schools, businesses, and other non-health governmental agencies…PCHs are frequently established to leverage resources and maximize the synergies that many agencies bring to the table” [ 9 ] (p. E1) as “networks” of organizations working collaboratively [ 10 ]. Given the increasing use of networks as an approach in public health, evidence to inform the management and evaluation of effective networks is essential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data was categorized under a code after consensus between the two researchers was reached. Even though we also recognized the importance of motivational and capability related factors during policymaking [ 21 , 22 ], they will not be discussed in this article.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Spiegel et al, (2012), the crosssectoral action is feasible for health activities. Collaboration requires a more collaborative organizational structure in practice (Hendriks et al, 2015). The issues contained in intersectoral collaboration are information share, service change, resource share and crosssectoral training (Burgess et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%