2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10526-015-9709-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local host-dependent persistence of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae used to control the large pine weevil Hylobius abietis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dillon et al's (2008a) study compared various species in a uniform setting (pine stumps on deep peat soil), while Harvey and Griffin (2015) monitored persistence of a single species (S. carpocapsae) under varied conditions: Llodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Douglas) and Sitka spruce stumps on peat (nearly pure organic matter) or mineral soil. Similar to the results obtained by Dillon et al (2008a), the percentage of soil cores with S. carpocapsae decreased significantly within the first two years after EPN application, from up to 12 % of cores after five months to 3 % after two years (Harvey & Griffin, 2016). Five years after application, only indigenous Steinernema spp.…”
Section: Risk Of Epn Application In Forest Ecosystem A) Establishmentsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dillon et al's (2008a) study compared various species in a uniform setting (pine stumps on deep peat soil), while Harvey and Griffin (2015) monitored persistence of a single species (S. carpocapsae) under varied conditions: Llodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Douglas) and Sitka spruce stumps on peat (nearly pure organic matter) or mineral soil. Similar to the results obtained by Dillon et al (2008a), the percentage of soil cores with S. carpocapsae decreased significantly within the first two years after EPN application, from up to 12 % of cores after five months to 3 % after two years (Harvey & Griffin, 2016). Five years after application, only indigenous Steinernema spp.…”
Section: Risk Of Epn Application In Forest Ecosystem A) Establishmentsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Five years after application, only indigenous Steinernema spp. were found around stumps (Harvey & Griffin, 2016). Similar results were obtained for stump bark: S. carpocapsae was found under the bark of up to 67 % of stumps one and two years after application, but was not detected there four or five years post application (Harvey & Griffin, 2016).…”
Section: Risk Of Epn Application In Forest Ecosystem A) Establishmentsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…One hypothesis to explain why S. carpocapsae does better when applied to soil rather than at the top is that IJs that are carried into the space between the bark and wood may be encouraged to sit and wait there. S. carpocapsae was detected in this location up to two years postapplication, though this was assumed to include nematodes that had recycled in LPW (Harvey and Griffin, 2016). The host species with which S. carpocapsae has most frequently been associated is the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (Peters 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Safety may also be examined in terms of persistence of EPNs in the treated area. In a field experiment, S. carpocapsae was detected in the soil up to two years after application, but not after four years, and its presence was positively correlated with that of its large pine weevil host [ 165 ], an optimistic result regarding potential environmental risk.…”
Section: Interaction With the Biotic And Abiotic Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%