2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12253-019-00758-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Inflammatory Response Can Predict Clinical Outcome in Patients with Curatively Resected Stage-IIB Colon Cancer: An Advanced Methodological Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies targeted the predictive value of inflammatory factors or immune cells and revealed that high inflammation level was correlated with poor outcomes. 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 A previous study reviewed 2334 patients with gastric cancer and built a model using inflammatory biomarkers. 26 Mehmet Zengin used several methods to evaluate the local inflammatory response, which is an indicator of colon cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies targeted the predictive value of inflammatory factors or immune cells and revealed that high inflammation level was correlated with poor outcomes. 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 A previous study reviewed 2334 patients with gastric cancer and built a model using inflammatory biomarkers. 26 Mehmet Zengin used several methods to evaluate the local inflammatory response, which is an indicator of colon cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 26 Mehmet Zengin used several methods to evaluate the local inflammatory response, which is an indicator of colon cancer. 27 Another study mentioned that a neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio is a useful serum biomarker of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 28 These studies mainly focused on peripheral blood cell proportions and acute‐phase protein levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Briefly, histopathological evaluations can be divided intrabiopsy evaluation (section, area and focus) and extrabiopsy evaluation (staining, magnification, and counting). Model A [17] was used for intrabiopsy evaluation and method 1 [18] was used for extrabiopsy evaluation. And both of these methods yielded successful results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different methods have been used in the literature to evaluate BD [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. This study was based on two successful methods, model A and method 1 [17,18]. Model A recommends using the hot spot area, deepest invasive block, invasive margin.…”
Section: Optimal Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%