2018
DOI: 10.5751/es-09949-230214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local knowledge in ecological modeling

Abstract: Local people and scientists both hold ecological knowledge, respectively stemming from prolonged day-today contact with the environment and from systematic inquiry based on the scientific method. As the complementarity between scientific ecological knowledge (SEK) and local ecological knowledge (LEK) is increasingly acknowledged, LEK is starting to be involved in all branches of ecology, including ecological modeling. However, the integration of both knowledge types into ecological models raises methodological… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Certainly, our observational potential grew steadily during the last few years and increasing efforts are devoted to conceive global observation systems for up-to-date information on the state of biodiversity and the threats it faces (Tittensor et al, 2014). To achieve this, the use of standardized and cost-effective procedures is needed to underpin a large-scale observation strategy that can accommodate countries across a range of baseline knowledge levels and capabilities (Bélisle, Asselin, LeBlanc, & Gauthier, 2018;Latombe et al, 2017). These are key principles for collecting and integrating information from stakeholders across national boundaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly, our observational potential grew steadily during the last few years and increasing efforts are devoted to conceive global observation systems for up-to-date information on the state of biodiversity and the threats it faces (Tittensor et al, 2014). To achieve this, the use of standardized and cost-effective procedures is needed to underpin a large-scale observation strategy that can accommodate countries across a range of baseline knowledge levels and capabilities (Bélisle, Asselin, LeBlanc, & Gauthier, 2018;Latombe et al, 2017). These are key principles for collecting and integrating information from stakeholders across national boundaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, distributions of widespread species, such as Platydracus stercorarius, Ocypus ophthalmicus (see description in Section S1), were more difficult to predict compared to those of rare species [50,51]. Nevertheless, the obtained species distribution maps can be considered as quite reliable based on local ecological knowledge, which is becoming increasingly important in ecological modelling in general [101,102]. In particular, the SDMs met our expectations of more similar distribution patterns for Platydracus stercorarius and Dinothenarus fossor, which are both macro-habitat generalists and strongly dependent on vegetated areas, compared to the predicted distribution of Ocypus ophthalmicus, which is less dependent on vegetation (see description in Section S1).…”
Section: Model Performances To Predict Invertebrate Species Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Bélisle et al. ). Participation by IPLCs in ecological monitoring therefore offers important knowledge contributions to local, national, regional, and even global assessment initiatives (IPBES , Ens et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%