2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2012.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local L and epsilon factors in Hecke eigenvalues

Abstract: Abstract. Formulas (Theorems 4.2 and 5.1) which express the local L-factor and the local epsilon factor of an irreducible admissible representation of GL d over a non-archimedean local field in terms of the eigenvalues of some explicitly given Hecke operators are derived.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, µ n−1 are complex numbers whose i-th elementary symmetric polynomial equals to q i(i−1)/2−i λ i , for 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1, and µ n = 0. By [9] Theorem 4.2, we have…”
Section: An Explicit Formula For Whittaker Functionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, µ n−1 are complex numbers whose i-th elementary symmetric polynomial equals to q i(i−1)/2−i λ i , for 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1, and µ n = 0. By [9] Theorem 4.2, we have…”
Section: An Explicit Formula For Whittaker Functionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…, λ n−1 (see section 3 for precise definition). Kondo and Yasuda [9] showed the relation between these Hecke eigenvalues and the L-factor of π. We therefore obtain an explicit formula for W on T 1 in terms of the L-factor of π (Theorem 4.1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, by (58) and t p • v 0 = v 0 the lattice L λ,O is stable under the renormalized action of t p . Recall the definition of d x in (6) and define the lattices…”
Section: Integral Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…due to the arbitrary ramification we allow: The known explicit formulae for the valuation of Whittaker functions (cf. [58,61,62]) imply the vanishing of the ordinary projection of the essential vectors in these cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the appendix of the paper[17] by the second and third authors, they introduce a notion of mirahoric representations (see Section A.1.6 of[17]). Let us recall the definition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%