2017
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa65a6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local land–atmosphere feedbacks limit irrigation demand

Abstract: Irrigation is known to influence regional climate but most studies forecast and simulate irrigation with offline (i.e. land only) models. Using south eastern Australia as a test bed, we demonstrate that irrigation demand is fundamentally different between land only and land-atmosphere simulations. While irrigation only has a small impact on maximum temperature, the semi-arid environment experiences near surface moistening in coupled simulations over the irrigated regions, a feedback that is prevented in offlin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A limitation of the work presented here is therefore the lack of the atmospheric feedback in the uncoupled configuration. However, the Decker et al (2017) results indicate that a coupled configuration would likely reduce irrigation amounts simulated by the model. As the irrigation demand was greater in the model than in the humanpractice observations, the coupled atmosphere has the potential to reduce irrigation amounts to be more in line with those observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A limitation of the work presented here is therefore the lack of the atmospheric feedback in the uncoupled configuration. However, the Decker et al (2017) results indicate that a coupled configuration would likely reduce irrigation amounts simulated by the model. As the irrigation demand was greater in the model than in the humanpractice observations, the coupled atmosphere has the potential to reduce irrigation amounts to be more in line with those observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Recent work by Decker et al (2017) shows that atmospheric feedbacks can reduce the irrigation demand simulated by a land surface model. That is, a coupled model configuration allows the atmosphere to respond to the irrigation application, moistening the near-surface area, and reducing the need for additional irrigation as compared to the same model run uncoupled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that we do not test these new developments against the older version 1.4b in this manuscript as these new developments are the new default settings for CABLE. Furthermore, the new stomatal conductance scheme has been tested offline (De Kauwe et al, ) and in ACCESS (Kala, De Kauwe, et al, ), and the groundwater model and subgrid‐scale runoff parameterization and new pore‐scale formulation for soil evaporation has been tested offline (Decker ; Decker, Or, et al, ) and in WRF (Decker, Ma, et al, ). The focus of this work is to test the sensitivity of WRF‐LIS‐CABLE to a collection of available atmospheric physics options in WRF.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes the parameterization of irrigation (e.g. Cook, Shukla, Puma, & Nazarenko, ; De Vrese, Hagemann, & Claussen, ; Decker, Ma, & Pitman, ; Guimberteau, Laval, Perrier, & Polcher, ; Harding & Snyder, ; Lawston, Santanello, Zaitchik, & Rodell, ; Qian, Huang, Yang, & Berg, ; Sacks, Cook, Buenning, Levis, & Helkowski, ; Thiery et al., ) to fully interactive crop modules that incorporate different crop varieties with defined growing seasons and fallow periods (e.g. Levis et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davin, Seneviratne, Ciais, Olioso, & Wang, 2014;Hirsch, Wilhelm, Davin, Thiery, & Seneviratne, 2017;Luyssaert et al, 2014;Thiery et al, 2017), and influences local responses to projected climate change This includes the parameterization of irrigation (e.g. Cook, Shukla, Puma, & Nazarenko, 2014;De Vrese, Hagemann, & Claussen, 2016;Decker, Ma, & Pitman, 2017;Guimberteau, Laval, Perrier, & Polcher, 2012;Harding & Snyder, 2012;Lawston, Santanello, Zaitchik, & Rodell, 2015;Qian, Huang, Yang, & Berg, 2013;Sacks, Cook, Buenning, Levis, & Helkowski, 2008;Thiery et al, 2017) to fully interactive crop modules that incorporate different crop varieties with defined growing seasons and fallow periods (e.g. Levis et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%