2013
DOI: 10.1002/grl.50726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local late Amazonian boulder breakdown and denudation rate on Mars

Abstract: [1] Inactive fan surfaces become smoother and develop desert pavement over time by weathering and erosion. We use this mechanism to estimate late Amazonian boulder breakdown and surface denudation rates on a young ( 1.25 Ma) (Schon et al., 2009) fan on Mars. This is done by comparing boulder size and surface relief between lobes of different ages. The boulder breakdown rate is 3.5 m/Myr, surface smoothing (denudation) rate is approximated as 0.89 m/Myr. These rates exceed previous estimates for the Amazonian b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data point at 0.1 Myr is for degradation of Concepción crater (class 1) as described in the text and represents the maximum short‐term rate in the modern era. Erosion rate marked M1 includes our classes 2 and 3 crater degradation rates at Meridiani Planum, plus erosion of an alluvial fan [ de Haas et al ., ], and lightly cratered layered terrain [ Malin and Edgett , ; McEwen et al ., ]. Erosion rates marked M2 are from our class 4–6 degradation rates for craters in Meridiani Planum.…”
Section: Discussion: Erosion Rate Changes With Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data point at 0.1 Myr is for degradation of Concepción crater (class 1) as described in the text and represents the maximum short‐term rate in the modern era. Erosion rate marked M1 includes our classes 2 and 3 crater degradation rates at Meridiani Planum, plus erosion of an alluvial fan [ de Haas et al ., ], and lightly cratered layered terrain [ Malin and Edgett , ; McEwen et al ., ]. Erosion rates marked M2 are from our class 4–6 degradation rates for craters in Meridiani Planum.…”
Section: Discussion: Erosion Rate Changes With Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erosion of ejecta blocks to liberate blueberries around Concepción crater has been estimated at about 1 m/Ma in the past 10 ka [ Golombek et al ., ], and infill has been estimated at 10 m/Ma (section 7.1). Erosion and smoothing of boulders on a ~1 Ma inactive alluvial fan has been estimated at ~1 m/Myr [ de Haas et al ., ]. Abrasion rates of 1–10 m/Myr have been estimated from measurements of the migration rate of sand ripples and dune lee fronts at the Nili Patera dune field [ Bridges et al ., ].…”
Section: Rate Of Crater Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Median backweathering rates as a function of crater age (= measurement time interval) for the studied Martian craters, Meteor crater (i.e., Barringer crater) on Earth, the reported terrestrial rock faces given in Figure and Table S1, and the erosion rates reported in Golombek et al [] (as shown in their Figure 25, compiled from data of Malin and Edgett [], McEwen et al [], Golombek et al [], De Haas et al [], Golombek et al [], and Farley et al []). Backweathering rates for Meteor crater were derived with the method applied to the Martian craters, using a LiDAR DEM with 1 m spatial resolution (Figure S12 and Data Set S1; http://www. lpi.usra.edu/publications/books/barringer/crater/guidebook/LiDAR/), the age of Meteor crater is 49±3 ka [ Sutton , ; Nishiizumi et al , ; Phillips et al , ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pristine craters are important chronostratigraphic markers for recent exogenic processes acting on the Martian surface [e.g., Schon and Head , ; Johnsson et al , ]. Constraining the timing of these impacts facilitates quantifying rates of the exogenic processes acting upon craters since their formation [e.g., De Haas et al , , ]. Pristine, Late Amazonian aged, craters enable (1) the measurement of relatively recent, Late Amazonian, backweathering rates and (2) the determination of their age because they have well‐defined rays and ejecta on which the size‐frequency distribution of superposed craters can be estimated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This criterion was previously used to prove for certain valleys that they were not formed by seepage erosion (Craddock and Howard, 2002;Lamb et al, 2006). When considering valleys on Mars, the ability of the flow to transport the material should be considered as well as possible weathering rates which may both obscure the former presence of large block or increases erosion (de Haas et al, 2013).…”
Section: Sedimentary Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%