2022
DOI: 10.1080/17477891.2022.2141178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local-level managers’ attitudes towards natural hazards resilience: the case of Texas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A cursory survey of publications citing Rittel and Webber (1973) in Web of Science categories shows that nearly half are related to DRR (under topics such as environmental sciences and regional urban planning), confirming that the intractability of disasters is on the academic mind. Closer to the subject at hand, there is research on wicked problems in disaster and emergency management (Dvir et al, 2022;Forrester et al, 2019), climate change (Lazarus, 2008), and more recently, a spate of articles concerning wicked problems of sustainability and in the COVID-19 context, suggesting a renewed interest in its theoretical contributions (see Moon, 2020;Noto et al, 2023).…”
Section: Drr-related Study Of Wicked Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cursory survey of publications citing Rittel and Webber (1973) in Web of Science categories shows that nearly half are related to DRR (under topics such as environmental sciences and regional urban planning), confirming that the intractability of disasters is on the academic mind. Closer to the subject at hand, there is research on wicked problems in disaster and emergency management (Dvir et al, 2022;Forrester et al, 2019), climate change (Lazarus, 2008), and more recently, a spate of articles concerning wicked problems of sustainability and in the COVID-19 context, suggesting a renewed interest in its theoretical contributions (see Moon, 2020;Noto et al, 2023).…”
Section: Drr-related Study Of Wicked Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at mid-level officials' (termed professional stakeholders) views on institution of preventative-type planning, Dvir and colleagues [73] found that there was appreciation of the need for preventative strategies, but less willingness to fund those approaches with direct resources; instead, a prioritization of recovery is highlighted, which does not put an emphasis on resilience. This is disappointing as addressing vulnerability vis à vis management of risk can have real benefits; with recovery approaches, costs are pushed down the road, but the result is not actually cheaper.…”
Section: Resilience Of Rural Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%