2001
DOI: 10.1155/s016117120100391x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local maxima of a random algebraic polynomial

Abstract: Abstract. We present a useful formula for the expected number of maxima of a normal process ξ(t) that occur below a level u. In the derivation we assume chiefly that ξ(t), ξ (t), and ξ (t) have, with probability one, continuous 1 dimensional distributions and expected values of zero. The formula referred to above is then used to find the expected number of maxima below the level u for the random algebraic polynomial. This result highlights the very pronounced difference in the behaviour of the random algebraic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For those distributions that do not belong to the above domain, Logan and Shepp [9] and [10] show there is a slight increase to the coefficient (2/π) obtained for EN n (−∞, ∞). Wilkins [14] obtained an interesting result by showing that the error term for the asymptotic formula is small and is in fact independent of n. Other interesting results in this direction are due to Sambandham [12] and [13] and Farahmand and Hannigan [5] and [6]. These results and other related topics are discussed in some detail in two books, one by Bharucha-Reid and Sambandham [1], the other by Farahmand [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For those distributions that do not belong to the above domain, Logan and Shepp [9] and [10] show there is a slight increase to the coefficient (2/π) obtained for EN n (−∞, ∞). Wilkins [14] obtained an interesting result by showing that the error term for the asymptotic formula is small and is in fact independent of n. Other interesting results in this direction are due to Sambandham [12] and [13] and Farahmand and Hannigan [5] and [6]. These results and other related topics are discussed in some detail in two books, one by Bharucha-Reid and Sambandham [1], the other by Farahmand [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%