Local Migration Regimes in Rural Areas: The Example of Refugee Reception in Saxony, Germany

Abstract

The reception of asylum seekers has challenged municipalities and their populations across Europe in recent years: Many rural villages and small and mid-sized towns had little prior experience with large numbers of asylum seekers. The housing of refugees constitutes one of the most controversial arenas and challenges for local communities within the reception process.
 This paper sheds light on rural case studies using the perspective of migration regimes. Local Migration Regimes constitute arenas of migration-related processes including actors, practices, and negotiations at different scales. The analysis covers four rural municipalities (two villages, two towns) from two Saxonian counties in Germany. All cases have different strategies for accommodating migrants but all can be seen as post-socialist immigration societies. The findings show that the issue of reception and housing is seen as a recurrent and contested local field of conflict and cooperation in the rural case sites. The regime lens highlights the strong dependencies but also fragmentation between different levels (national, regional, and supra-local). Housing practices and strategies for refugees reflect local discourses and contribute to the social and spatial production of migration. I argue, that the regime lens contributes to an interdisciplinary understanding of local settings, acknowledges spatial and social structures but challenges empirical field work and data sets. This empirical research is based on qualitative interviews, media articles, and documents from rural counties in Germany and was conducted within the joint research project “Future for Refugees in Rural Regions of Germany”.
 * This article belongs to a special issue on "Refugee Migration to Europe – Challenges and Potentials for Cities and Regions".

(Non-)Institutional Manifestations of Migrant Infrastructures for Refugees in Rural Greece

“…The empirical material presented above provides extensive evidence of how formal and informal arrival and migration infrastructures manifest themselves in a rural area of Greece. Similar recent research has shown that there are significant challenges and disputes in the reception and accommodation of refugees at the local and regional level (Schneider, 2022;Wehrhahn (Non-)…”

“…Overall, the urban bias of migration and refugee research is also evident in the way arrival infrastructures are conceptualised and described in relation to the urban social fibre (Meeus et al, 2019;Hanhoester & Wessendorf, 2020;Wessendorf, 2021). For various reasons, many rural areas have become superdiverse and their capacity to receive, accommodate and integrate newcomers is limited due to a lack of institutional infrastructures (Wessendorf & Phillimore, 2019;Papadopoulos & Fratsea, 2021;Schneider, 2022). Furthermore, social fibre in rural areas enables informal social arrangements based on employment structure and opportunities, material wellbeing and existing social infrastructures.…”

Post‐2015 refugees in Germany: “Culture of welcome”, solidarity or exclusion?

“…This means that even when forced migrants are recognized as refugees, they have to stay three years within the bounds of the federal states or even of the municipalities that they are allocated to, if they are reliant on social welfare. Scholarship has demonstrated that the transition from accommodation centres to housing is far from smooth due to competitiveness of the already‐strained housing markets, discrimination (Adam et al, 2021) and more broadly internal/local border regimes in place (El‐Kayed & Hamann, 2018; Schneider, 2022). It also underlines the significance of networks in overcoming these disadvantages (Adam et al 2021).…”

“…It also underlines the significance of networks in overcoming these disadvantages (Adam et al 2021). While most studies focus on the city contexts, recent literature has also spotlighted the particular hardship of the residence obligation for refugees initially assigned to rural areas as well as the potential of rural areas for integration (Mehl et al, 2023; Schneider, 2022). In this special issue, Weidinger and Kordel (2020) contributes to the literature through a long‐term empirical study combining surveys, individual, expert and household interviews in two rural areas in Bavaria.…”