2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1514-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local motion inside an object affects pointing less than smooth pursuit

Abstract: During smooth pursuit eye movements, brieXy presented objects are mislocalized in the direction of motion. It has been proposed that the localization error is the sum of the pursuit signal and the retinal motion signal in a »200 ms interval after Xash onset. To evaluate contributions of retinal motion signals produced by the entire object (global motion) and elements within the object (local motion), we asked observers to reach to Xashed Gabor patches (Gaussian-windowed sine-wave gratings). Global motion was m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
3
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, there is no evidence that such active control leads to error-free performance, as we had speculated in the Introduction. On the contrary, the magnitude of the errors found in the current study would appear to be on the higher end of the 2-15 min arc range previously estimated for perception alone [De Valois and De Valois 1991;Kerzel et al 2008;Tsui et al 2007]. Indeed, those estimates also include peripherally presented targets, and it is known that illusory displacement scales with eccentricity, increasing by 1-2 min arc per degree [Chung et al 2007;De Valois and De Valois 1991;Fu et al 2004].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clearly, there is no evidence that such active control leads to error-free performance, as we had speculated in the Introduction. On the contrary, the magnitude of the errors found in the current study would appear to be on the higher end of the 2-15 min arc range previously estimated for perception alone [De Valois and De Valois 1991;Kerzel et al 2008;Tsui et al 2007]. Indeed, those estimates also include peripherally presented targets, and it is known that illusory displacement scales with eccentricity, increasing by 1-2 min arc per degree [Chung et al 2007;De Valois and De Valois 1991;Fu et al 2004].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…When the sine-wave grating component of a Gabor patch is made to drift locally either to the left or right, the global position of the entire patch appears shifted in that direction, even though the physical position of the patch does not change [De Valois and De Valois 1991;Fu et al 2004]. Although the magnitude of this Gabor-based motion-induced illusory displacement is typically small -ranging between 2 and 15 min arc for centrally presented targets [De Valois and De Valois 1991;Kerzel et al 2008;Tsui et al 2007] -it is highly robust and has proven to be a very useful experimental tool for exploring the relationship between motion and position [Bressler and Whitney 2006;Chung et al 2007;Fu et al 2004;Kerzel and Gegenfurtner 2005;Rider et al 2009;Yamagishi et al 2001].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our first finding provides yet another example of the robust nature of this illusion. Although the size of the perceived shift during the passive task was relatively small, even for a centrally viewed target (De Valois and De Valois, 1991 ; Tsui et al, 2007 ; Kerzel et al, 2008 ), the influence of motion on position was extremely consistent, showing the same pattern in all 12 participants. In the absence of motion, there was a slight tendency to perceive the patch to the right of center, a tendency that was more apparent during the post-test phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, if the patch drifts to the left or right within the aperture, the perceived position of the whole aperture is also shifted in the same direction. While the magnitude of this type of illusory position shift is typically quite small—ranging from 2 to 15 min arc for centrally presented targets (De Valois and De Valois, 1991 ; Tsui et al, 2007 ; Kerzel et al, 2008 )—it is highly robust and has proven particularly useful for exploring the level of visual processing that gives rise to MIPS (e.g., Fu et al, 2004 ; Arnold et al, 2007 ; Tsui et al, 2007 ; Mather and Pavan, 2009 ; Kosovicheva et al, 2012 ; Maus et al, 2013a , b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La captura atencional propone que estas interacciones pueden estar influenciadas por información biológicamente relevante, por características físicas de los estímulos o por las demandas del individuo. En cual-quiera de los casos, persiste el debate en torno a cuáles categorías de estímulos podrían ser más o menos fáciles de ignorar y si los movimientos oculares son una medida confiable que logre reflejar la captura atencional a los distractores (Hutton, 2008;Kerzel et al, 2008;McSorley & McCloy, 2009). En cuanto a esta última pregunta, se ha encontrado asociación entre los ERP y los movimientos oculares (Weaver et al, 2017), así como los movimientos oculares y la actividad hemodinámica cerebral en áreas asociadas con atención (Kimmig et al, 2001) que parecen reflejar patrones de actividad similares a los encontrados en los estudios de resonancia magnética funcional para los mecanismos de selección y supresión .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified