Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001500.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local oestrogen for vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
161
0
18

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
161
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…A Cochrane data analysis of 19 randomized controlled trials with 4,162 patients conWrmed these results and demonstrated a signiWcant relief of vaginal atrophy symptoms using estradiol releasing vaginal creams, pessaries, tablets and vaginal ring compared to placebo and non-hormonal vaginal gel [43].…”
Section: Vaginal Htmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A Cochrane data analysis of 19 randomized controlled trials with 4,162 patients conWrmed these results and demonstrated a signiWcant relief of vaginal atrophy symptoms using estradiol releasing vaginal creams, pessaries, tablets and vaginal ring compared to placebo and non-hormonal vaginal gel [43].…”
Section: Vaginal Htmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…SigniWcant reductions in vaginal pH values, patient assessment to vaginal dryness, dyspareunia and cytologic patterns of mucosa changes were demonstrated in women using estrogen vaginal cream compared to moisturizing gel [72].…”
Section: Alternatives To Htmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es konnte eine signifikante Reduktion der Vaginalatrophie durch die lokale HT gezeigt werden [26]. Die lokale Anwendung von Östrogenen ermöglicht den Einsatz geringer Dosierungen zur Therapie vulvovaginaler Beschwerden.…”
Section: Lokale öStrogentherapieunclassified
“…Entspre chend betrug der Zeitabstand zur Menopau se im untersuchten Patientenkollektiv im Mittel [15] und dass die Ak zeptanz dieser Applikationsform im Ver gleich zu Scheidenzäpfchen höher ist [16].…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified