Local people's accounts of climate change: to what extent are they influenced by the media?

Abstract

Researchers using local and indigenous people's accounts of climate change in their scientific work often face scepticism regarding the value of such information. The critics' argument is that since local and indigenous people are often exposed to the global discourse on climate change, their observations and information may in fact be reproductions of science popularized through communication media. There are instances in which local people's accounts of climate change and impacts thereof may be influenced by how media frame and popularize scientific models and predictions. However, we propose several reasons why the influence of media reports and coverage of climate change is usually superficial. First, there are significant differences between the epistemologies employed by media and those of local people. Although media may be borrowing local environmental categories, they may be filling them with different content, leading to incoherence. Second, media accounts are often general and locally irrelevant, in contrast with the detailed local anchoring of the knowledge often held by people who rely on natural resources for their livelihoods. Their observations often rely on holistic ways of knowing their environments, integrating large numbers of variables, and the relationships between these. We propose that accounts based on such observations are probably not influenced by media framings and that uncovering their underlying ‘ways of knowing’ would provide valuable additional evidence in interdisciplinary studies of climate change. WIREs Clim Change 2013, 4:1–8. doi: 10.1002/wcc.199 This article is categorized under: Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Sociology/Anthropology of Climate Knowledge

Perception and Interpretation of Climate Change among Quechua Farmers of Bolivia: Indigenous Knowledge as a Resource for Adaptive Capacity

“…Their observations rely on their personal experience and are more detailed than science and media discourse on global climate change (Marin and Berkes 2013). People's general observations of change were consistent with scientific observations (Perez et al 2010, Marengo et al 2011, and went beyond merely temperature increases to include unpredictability of rainfall, increase of extreme events, and incidence of pests.…”

Can Perceptions of Environmental and Climate Change in Island Communities Assist in Adaptation Planning Locally?

“…While our understanding of climate change benefits from scientific gathering of world data and the construction of generic models, on-the-ground research is the micro-foundation of global environmental change research because this is how it is experienced and lived (and adapted to) by both ecosystems and human populations. As argued by Marin and Berkes (2013), climate change media discourse can influence local people's perceptions, but these tend to be only superficial. Local people experience their environment differentially and can discern local processes beyond these superficial narratives.…”

Learning about Climate: An Exploration of the Socialization of Climate Change

“…Nevertheless, in a recent study by Marin and Berkes (2013), media accounts of climate change were reported to be largely irrelevant to local communities, as a result of the contrasting epistemological positions between the media and the communities. Accordingly, they argue that climate change knowledge of local nonscientific communities is not influenced by media frames of climate change alone but more readily shaped by a range of information sources and the interplay between the sources 3 (Marin and Berkes 2013).…”

“…The mass media's role in providing informal nonscientific climate change education has received considerable academic attention (Bell 1994b;Wilson 2000a,b;Carvalho and Burgess 2005;Boykoff 2007a,b;Boykoff and Boykoff 2007;Ryghaug et al 2011;Marin and Berkes 2013). Media agenda setting theory (Atwater et al 1985;Zhu and Blood 1997) suggests that the salience of an issue can be raised through increased media attention (Sherry 2002).…”

“…Accordingly, they argue that climate change knowledge of local nonscientific communities is not influenced by media frames of climate change alone but more readily shaped by a range of information sources and the interplay between the sources 3 (Marin and Berkes 2013). Indeed, research suggests that information provision in general has a limited influence on public attitudes and therefore it is public engagement with information that requires greater examination (Lorenzoni and Hulme 2009 Migration is central to New Zealand society (Lovelock et al 2012).…”