Local plant knowledge and its variation among farmer’s families in the Napf region, Switzerland

Abstract

Background Local plant knowledge typically is unevenly distributed within a community. This knowledge variation is important in understanding people’s relationship with their environment. Here we ask about knowledge variation among farmers’ families in the Napf region of Switzerland. Methods In 2008 and 2009, 60 adults and children living on 14 farms were interviewed about known and used plant species, and the data analyzed for knowledge variation. The farms were chosen by random stratified sampling, and freelisting and semi-structured interviews were conducted individually in the local idiom. The data were organized in an access database and analyzed with descriptive statistics, correlations, Mann–Whitney U tests and cultural domain analysis. Results Totally, 456 folk taxa were listed, whereas frequently listed species are common meadow and forest species. Uses were indicated for 391 taxa, most of them culinary, followed by fodder, wood, medicinal and ornamental uses. Local plant knowledge correlates with age and gender. Due to professional specialization, adults above 20 years have broader plant knowledge than children and adolescents. This is true for almost all examined habitat and plant use categories except for toy uses. Women and men share a common body of plant knowledge especially about herbaceous grassland species and woody species. Specialized knowledge of men is linked to cattle fodder and the processing of wood, specialized knowledge of women concerns edible, medicinal and ornamental plants, often garden species, but also herbaceous forest species. Conclusion In a rural region like the Napf, people retain a solid basis of plant knowledge. The variation of plant knowledge within farmers’ families of this region reflects sociocultural patterns. As these patterns are changing and as (agro)biodiversity is declining, local plant knowledge in the Napf region is suspected to undergo a mainstreaming process.

Plant blindness represents the loss of generational knowledge and cultural identity

“…The plant identification across ages and habitats shows that 18-26 age group were least able to identify plants correctly, and The results of the younger groups being less able to identify plants speaks to their inexperience in identifying plants within the study area. This result is consistent with research that has been done in different parts of the world, measuring limited knowledge of plants in youth (Fritsch & Dreesmann, 2015;Perez et al, 2010;Poncet et al, 2021). These results may be indicative of plant blindness in younger generations or a lack of education and experience.…”

“…This study tested survey participants on their knowledge of commonly known plants that would be easily identifiable by persons living in area, and plants that would be identifiable to an avid plant person. The reasoning for this type of testing was developed from previous research which presented information on individuals’ ability to easily identify plants considered to be numerous, well‐known, beneficial, or easily accessible versus plants not as well‐known nor easily accessible (Loki et al., 2021; Poncet et al., 2021; Turreira‐Garcia et al., 2015).…”

“…This loss of experience and education with plant species once important to Native American culture represents a loss of knowledge and culture being passed to younger generations. Poncet et al (2021) report that among indigenous societies, formal schooling was of minor importance and even potentially detrimental to the environmental knowledge of youth. However, identifying and applying conservation strategies to areas with traditionally used plants can be used to support culture and aid in teaching about plants to younger generations (Pesek et al, 2009).…”

Ethnomedicinal plants in Champadevi rural municipality, Okhaldhunga district, Nepal

“…It may be due to the elders' increased plant knowledge. Nonetheless, this may be more than a mere factor, as plant knowledge is linked to social context [ 45 ]. Older generations serve as custodians of traditional knowledge, are more familiar with traditional treatments, and have limited exposure to modern medical procedures [ 46 ].…”

Are we romanticizing traditional knowledge? A plea for more experimental studies in ethnobiology

“…Also, religious denomination can affect land management practices in Switzerland. The sociocultural differences between the protestant canton of Bern and the catholic canton of Lucerne are amongst others reflected in the fact that contrary to the practice followed in the canton of Lucerne, the grassland in the canton of Bern gets cleaned from bitter dock ( Rumex obtusifolius L.), a noxious weed [ 27 ]. In the past also a catholic and a protestant way of tilling the land existed in Switzerland [ 28 ].…”