2016
DOI: 10.1002/num.22116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local projection stabilized and characteristic decoupled scheme for the fluid–fluid interaction problems

Abstract: In this article, we propose and analyse a local projection stabilized and characteristic decoupled scheme for the fluid–fluid interaction problems. We use the method of characteristics type to avert the difficulties caused by the nonlinear term, and use the local projection stabilized method to control spurious oscillations in the velocities due to dominant convection, and use a geometric averaging idea to decouple the monolithic problems. The stability analysis is derived and numerical tests are performed to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, we compare the effectiveness of the presented schemes with the first order schemes [26]. Furthermore, by a practical problem (submarine mountain problem), which has been proposed in [23], the performance of the schemes (3.1) and (3.2) is illustrated. Finally, the coast mountain or cliff problem [3] is applied to illustrate the performance of the presented schemes.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Besides, we compare the effectiveness of the presented schemes with the first order schemes [26]. Furthermore, by a practical problem (submarine mountain problem), which has been proposed in [23], the performance of the schemes (3.1) and (3.2) is illustrated. Finally, the coast mountain or cliff problem [3] is applied to illustrate the performance of the presented schemes.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this example, we check the presented schemes (3.1) and (3.2) on a practical problem with a submarine mountain problem [23]. We take ν 1 = 0.005 and ν 2 = 0.01 in this example.…”
Section: Submarine Mountain Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2021, they replaced the AV step of the AV‐DDC method in Reference [14] by subgrid artificial viscosity(SAV) step to propose a SAV‐DDC method [15], for smooth solutions, the SAV‐DDC method was second‐order in time and showed advantages over AV‐DDC method. Considering the case of low viscosities in both atmosphere and ocean fields, Qian et al adopted a local projection stabilized method to control spurious oscillations in the velocities and used a method of characteristics type to avert the difficulties caused by the nonlinear terms in Reference [16]. In 2020, Aggul et al combined the GA approach with a projection‐based variational multiscale stabilization (VMS) to propose a GA‐VMS method for coupled Navier–Stokes system [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A local projection stabilized and characteristic decoupled scheme aiming at the fluid-fluid interaction problems was proposed. It can reflect the extensive applications of the local projective method [32]. More recently, the parameters of the local projection filtering method were optimized and applied to noisily observed variations in light intensity between the star and its observer [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%