2017
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaj1669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local protein kinase A action proceeds through intact holoenzymes

Abstract: Hormones can transmit signals through adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate (cAMP) to precise intracellular locations. The fidelity of these responses relies on the activation of localized protein kinase A (PKA) holoenzymes. Association of PKA regulatory type II (RII) subunits with A-kinase—anchoring proteins (AKAPs) confers location, and catalytic (C) subunits phosphorylate substrates. Single-particle electron microscopy demonstrated that AKAP79 constrains RII-C subassemblies within 150 to 250 angstroms of its target… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
210
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
11
210
0
Order By: Relevance
“…C subunit activity is suppressed by a pseudosubstrate segment on R, which binds to the catalytic site on C and is released by cAMP (Brandon et al, 1997), although C does not have to be fully released from R in order to catalyze phosphorylation as indicated by correlating full dissociation of C from R or better a lack thereof with full enzymatic activity (Johnson et al, 1993;Yang et al, 1995). A recent publication seems to confirm these earlier studies as both R and C co-immunoprecipitate with the A kinase anchor protein AKAP5 from cell lysate prepared after strong b-adrenergic stimulation of the cells (Smith et al, 2017). Yet, followup work suggests that the co-immunoprecipitation is due to re-association of C with R upon cell lysis as cAMP becomes diluted (Walker- Gray et al, 2017).…”
Section: Pka: Structure Regulation and Localization By Akapsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…C subunit activity is suppressed by a pseudosubstrate segment on R, which binds to the catalytic site on C and is released by cAMP (Brandon et al, 1997), although C does not have to be fully released from R in order to catalyze phosphorylation as indicated by correlating full dissociation of C from R or better a lack thereof with full enzymatic activity (Johnson et al, 1993;Yang et al, 1995). A recent publication seems to confirm these earlier studies as both R and C co-immunoprecipitate with the A kinase anchor protein AKAP5 from cell lysate prepared after strong b-adrenergic stimulation of the cells (Smith et al, 2017). Yet, followup work suggests that the co-immunoprecipitation is due to re-association of C with R upon cell lysis as cAMP becomes diluted (Walker- Gray et al, 2017).…”
Section: Pka: Structure Regulation and Localization By Akapsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…cAMP production in response to physiological effectors of GPCR signalling appears not to promote catalytic subunit release from anchored PKA holoenzymes. 25 But this result has been challenged recently by Gray's group, 26 which proved that catalytic subunits are released from regulatory subunits by cAMP, and during cAMP activation, tether to R subunits does not restrict C subunit activity. These views remain controversial and have yet to be explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending on the concept of compartmentalization, the intracellular diffusion of cAMP has been shown to occur at a rate substantially slower than in aqueous solution (Agarwal et al, ). Clearly, cAMP will bind to its effector proteins throughout the cell and in this respect, it is noteworthy that the regulatory subunit of the main effector of cAMP, PKA, is an abundant protein and outnumbers the catalytic subunit in a wide range of tissues including brain (Walker‐Gray, Stengel, & Gold, ); incidentally, these authors also make a solid case for the idea that the catalytic subunit dissociates from the regulatory subunit upon binding of cAMP, a long‐held notion that was recently challenged (Smith et al, ; Smith et al, ). On a final note on PKA's contribution to compartmentalization of cAMP‐mediated responses, the findings of Walker‐Gray et al also suggest that active PKA catalytic subunits do not travel far before they are recaptured by regulatory subunits (Walker‐Gray et al, ).…”
Section: Potential Compartmentalization Of Camp Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, cAMP will bind to its effector proteins throughout the cell and in this respect, it is noteworthy that the regulatory subunit of the main effector of cAMP, PKA, is an abundant protein and outnumbers the catalytic subunit in a wide range of tissues including brain (Walker-Gray, Stengel, & Gold, 2017); incidentally, these authors also make a solid case for the idea that the catalytic subunit dissociates from the regulatory subunit upon binding of cAMP, a long-held notion that was recently challenged (Smith et al, 2013;Smith et al, 2017). On a final note on PKA's contribution to compartmentalization of cAMP-mediated F I G U R E 1 Directly and indirectly receptor-coupled cAMP signaling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%