MASCOTS '99. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommun
DOI: 10.1109/mascot.1999.805037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local resource allocation for providing end to end delay guarantees in ATM networks using PGPS scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper builds on the work done in [1], [5], and [8] where it was shown that if a call (f) traverses a path of K f PGPS schedulers and has traffic characteristics conforming to a leaky bucket with a maximum burst size of ( σ f ) bits and a long term average rate of ( ρ f ) bps, then an upper bound on the end-to-end delay is guaranteed for each ATM cell from call (f) by reserving a certain service rate at each switch along the call's path. The upper bound ( D f ) is given by:…”
Section: Delay Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This paper builds on the work done in [1], [5], and [8] where it was shown that if a call (f) traverses a path of K f PGPS schedulers and has traffic characteristics conforming to a leaky bucket with a maximum burst size of ( σ f ) bits and a long term average rate of ( ρ f ) bps, then an upper bound on the end-to-end delay is guaranteed for each ATM cell from call (f) by reserving a certain service rate at each switch along the call's path. The upper bound ( D f ) is given by:…”
Section: Delay Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next test is to verify that the value of the required end-to-end delay of the incoming call is not less than the minimum end-to-end delay bound that the network can guarantee to the incoming call. This minimum value ( D * f ) is obtained from (1) with each switch along the call's path reserving a service rate equal to its remaining capacity. We define the remaining capacity of a PGPS scheduler (j) prior to the acceptance of call (f) as:…”
Section: Cac Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Handling the variety in QoS requirements of different applications requires the network to use a mechanism for serving packets from different applications according to their granted QoS level. Many scheduling disciplines have been proposed in the literature to implement such mechanism (see [3,6,7,11,13]). Each scheduling discipline requires algorithms for performing call admission control (CAC) and resource reservation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%